M. Ted Tyndall. SEASONAL AND DIEL FEEDING PATTERNS AMONG JUVENILE FISH IN BOND CREEK, BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. (Under the direction of Charles W. O'Rear, Ph.D.) Department of Biology, July 1987. The seasonal and diel feeding pattern of spot (Leiostomus xantkuvus), Atlantic croaker (Micvoyogonias undulatus), southern flounder (Pavatidhthys lethostigma), and bay anchovy (Andhoa mitdhi.lt'í) were examined during their residence in the irridreaches of Bond Creek. Stomach analysis in addition to estimates of the abundance of zooplank- ton and benthos indicated that spot and Atlantic croaker are opportun- istic feeders. The items most often found in the stomachs were usually those items exhibiting a seasonal peak in abundance. Southern flounder however, extensively utilized mysids regardless of the season and exhib- i ted a secondary piscivorous feeding habit. Bay anchovy were found to be zoopl ankti vores utilizing larger zooplankton with increasing size. Little diel difference was seen in the type of prey consumed. Benthos however, were consumed more frequently at night by spot in early spring and late summer and in early summer by Atlantic croaker. Diet breadths were widest in spot and Atlantic croaker and narrow- est in southern flounder and bay anchovy. Diet overlap values were high for all six combinations. Mysids were the most selected prey using Ivlev's electivity index while calanoid copepods were the most avoided prey. Food source was not limited in Bond Creek during the study period consequently the four species occupied similar niches within Bond Creek. SEASONAL AND DIEL FEEDING PATTERNS AMONG JUVENILE FISH IN BOND CREEK, BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA A Thesi s Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Biology by M. Ted Tyndall July 1987 SEASONAL AND DIEL FEEDING PATTERNS AMONG JUVENILE FISH IN BOND CREEK BEAUFORT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA by M. Ted Tyndall APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS COMMITTEE MEMBER Mark M. Brinson, Ph.D. ' COMMITTEE MEMBER // ? ÙeiU, Vincent •I/ Beilis, Jr.^P)h?.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER Ronald G. Hodson, Ph.D, DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was part of a project conducted by the Institute of Coastal and Marine Resources which was funded by Texasgulf Inc. ICMR and the Biology Department of East Carolina University provided the equipment and facilities for successful completion of tni s project. This study would not have been possible without the early guidance and direction from the late Dr. Thomas J. Lawson. I would like to thank Dr. Charles W. O'Rear my committee chairman and members of my thesis committee. Dr. Mark M. Brinson, Dr. Vincent J. Beilis Jr., and Dr. Ronald G. Hodson for their helpful comments and sug- gesti ons. I would also like to acknowledge Loede Harper for helping with the data collection and processing, and Susan Holth for typing the manu- scri pt. Special thanks to iiy wonderful parents and B.J. for their constant support and companionship. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vi INTRODUCTION 1 I-IATERIALS AND METHODS 4 RESULTS 10 Hydrography 10 Zooplankton 10 Benthos 10 Stomach Contents 14 Spot 14 Atlantic croaker 18 Southern flounder 21 Bay anchovy 24 Seasonality 27 Winter 27 Early spring 27 Early summer 29 Late summer 29 Late fall 32 Diet Breadth 32 Diet Overlap 36 Ivlev's Index of Electivity 36 DISCUSSION 40 SUMMARY AUD CONCLUSIONS 44 LITERATURE CITED 46 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Location of Bond Creek indicating the area sampled 5 2. Percent composition by dry weight of major prey con- sumed by two species of fish collected during the day and night in Bond Creek, Beaufort County, M.C. during winter 1981 28 3. Percent composition by dry weight of major prey consumed by four species of fish collected during the day and night in Bond Creek, Beaufort County, N.C. during early spring 1981 30 4. Percent composition by dry weight of major prey consumed by two species of fish collected during the day and night in Bond Creek, Beaufort County, N.C. during early summer 1981 31 5. Percent composition by dry weight of major prey consumed by two species of fish collected during the day and night in Bond Creek, Beaufort County, N.C. during late summer 1981 33 6. Percent composition by dry weight of major prey consumed by four species of fish collected during the day and night in Bond Creek, Beaufort County, N.C. during late fall 1980 34 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Collection dates, temperature ranges, and seasons during the 1980 - 1982 Bond Creek study. The data set for each date is indicated 6 2. Seasonal surface (S) and bottom (B) water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen (D.O. ) values from Bond Creek during 1980 - 1982 studies 11 3. Mean densities (#/in +_ 1 S.E. ) of zooplankton collected during the day and night from two seasons in Bond Creek 12 4. Mean densities (#/m ± 1 S.E.) of benthic invertebrates by season collected from Bond Creek (total area sampled = 0.07m^) 13 5. Seasonal relative abundance (%) by number of benthic invertebrates collected from Bond Creek 15 6. Percentage of occurrence of different food items in the stomachs of spot containing food, collected during diel studies from Bond Creek during four seasons 16 7. Percent dry weight of the stomach contents of spot from Bond Creek. Mean lengths of spot in mm are indicated... 17 8. Percentage of occurrence of different food items in the stomachs of Atlantic croaker containing food, collected during diel studies from Bond Creek during five seasons 19 9.Percent dry weight of the stomach contents of Atlantic croaker from Bond Creek. Mean lengths of Atlantic croaker in mm are indicated 20 10. Percentage of occurrence of different food items in the stomachs of southern flounder containing food, collected during diel studies from Bond Creek during five seasons 22 11. Percent dry weight of the stomach contents of southern flounder from Bond Creek. Mean lengths of southern flounder in mm are indicated 23 12. Percentage of occurrence of different food items in the stomachs of bay anchovy containing food, collected during diel studies from Bond Creek during four seasons 25 13. Percent dry weight of the stomach contents of bay anchovy from Bond Creek. Mean lengths of bay anchovy in nm are indicated 26 14. Diet breadths of juvenile fish in Bond Creek based on mean percent dry weight of stomach contents 35 15. Diet overlap between juvenile fish in Bond Creek based on mean percent dry weight of stomach contents 37 16. Relative abundance {%) by number of selected prey items found in the gut (PG) and the environment (PE) and Ivlev's index of electivity (E) 39 INTRODUCTION The juvenile fish communities of shallow estuarine tributaries in the southeastern United States are composed of transient species along with a few permanent resident species (Miller et al. 1984). These transient species immigrate into the shallow tributaries as postlarvae and maintain residency until they emigrate as juveniles (Carr and Adams 1973, Chao and Musick 1977, and Ueinstein 1979). During this residence time, competition for habitat and food re- sources is great (Stickney et al. 1975; Currin et al. 1984). For these abundant populations to coexist, a resource partitioning or niche separation must occur. Christiansen and Fenchel (1977) described ni ctie separation of populations using three main dimensions involving time, habitat, and resource. Feeding-habit studies involving several species of fish have documented various factors involved in resource partitioning including differences in feeding periods (Kjelson et al. 1975; Hobson and Chess 1976), size differences and functional morphologies (Chao and Musick 1977; Keast 1985), habitat preference (Thorman 1983), and food partitioning (Kinch 1979; Galat and Vucinich 1983; MacDonald and Green 1986). However, as Schoener (1974) suggested, a complete un- derstanding of resource partitioning involves examination of the whole community including analysis at the individual level as well as the population level and not just a documentation of the differences in diet among the species. An understanding of the food resources available for each size class of all species that co-occur must be 2 included. Simple documentation of prey items eaten by each species and size class during each season ignores competition among the spe- ci es and size classes. Trawl data collected from a small tributary of the Pamlico River in 1980 indicated that three transient species and one resident spe- ci es comprised over 90% of the total juvenile fish catch (Lawson 1981). These four species were spot (Leiostomus xanthurus), Atlantic croaker (Miavopogonias undulatus), southern flounder (Pavalïahthys tethostigma), and bay anchovy (Anahoa mitahilli). The diets and modes of feeding of these four species have been extensively documen- ted. Spot and Atlantic croaker have been classified as opportunistic feeders utilizing the most abundant and available prey. Prey items f1o9u7n9d). in the stomach have included copepods, polychaetes, and bivalvesiphons (Darnell 1958; Kjelson et al. 1975; Stickney et al. 1975).Southern flounder are more selective in their feeding habits fre-quently choosing nysids and fish (Darnell 1958; Powell and SchwartzAnchovies have been described as zooplankti vores and utilize prey including copepods and mysids (Detwyler and Houde 1970; Schwartz 9180). Unfortunately, most of the studies only documented diet differ- enees among the species with seasonal variations. Many studies at- tempted to explain the resource partitioning but failed to have the ancillary biological data necessary to answer questions involving prey abundances, diel effects, or possible ontogenetic changes in feeding habits. 3 The purpose of this study was to determine the feeding habits of these four species of juvenile fish in a North Carolina estuary and to assess any niche separation or overlap among them. This asses- sment involved the testing of one major hypothesis and three sub- hypotheses: 1) Niche separation exists among the species as a result of differences in diets. A) Species exhibit seasonal differences in diets. B) Species exhibit diel differences in diets. C) Species exhibit varying degrees of selectivity in diet. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was conducted in the midreaches of Bond Creek which is located near the mouth of South Creek, a major tributary of the Pamlico River (Figure 1). Eight sampling trips were made between October 1980 and October 1982. Four species of juvenile fish (spot, Atlantic croaker, southern flounder, and bay anchovy) were collected during five consecutive seasons through December 1981. Zooplankton were collected during March and June 1981 while benthos were sampled over five consecutive seasons from September 1981 through October 1982. Since aquatic organisms are often dependent upon water temper- ature throughout several life stages and not on the calendar dates, the collection dates were categorized into seasons according to water temperature (Table 1). For stomach analyses, a di el series of trawl samples was taken during each season. Sampling times were scheduled so that each diel series coincided with the two predicted lunar high and low tides dur- i ng the day and night. Juvenile fish were collected with a 4.0-m, two-seam trawl made of 6.4-imi bar mesh equipped with a cod end bag of 3.2-mm mesh. The stomachs of all large fish (> 25mm) were injected with a buffered formalin solution within approximately 1 h after collection to stop digestion. Then the entire trawl catch was preserved in a 10% buf- fered formalin solution. Zooplankton were also collected during the diel series using two 250-um mesh conical nets with a mouth area of 800 cm . The nets were 5 Figure 1. Location of Bond Creek indicating the area sampled. 6 Table 1. Collection dates, temperature ranges, and seasons during the 1980 - 1982 Bond Creek study. The data set for each date is indicated. Collection Date “C Season Data Set October 27-28, 1980 13.0-14.6 Late Fall Stomach contents March 5-6, 1981 11.5-14.0 Early Spring Stomach contents Zooplankton June 8-9, 1981 26.0-29.2 Early Summer Stomach contents Zooplankton September 22-23, 1931 21.0-25.0 Late Summer Stomach contents Benthos December 21-22, 1981 3.2 - 5.8 Vii nter Stomach contents Benthos April 20-21, 1982 18.4-19.8 Late Spring Benthos August 17-13, 1902 27.0-29.6 Summer Benthos October 20-21, 1982 17.6-18.6 Early Fall Benthos 7 mounted on rectangular alurninum frames welded together so that they could be towed simultaneously. Replicate samples were collected from just below the water surface and, using an aluminum sled, from just above the creek bottom. Each net v;as equipped with a General Ocean- i cs flowmeter provided with a slow speed rotor. The two nets were towed for 2.5 min at a speed of approximately 2 km/h, after which their contents were pooled. All samples were preserved in 10% buf- fared formalin. Benthos were sampled using a 15.2 x 15.2 x 22.9-cm Ekman grab. Triplicate benthic samples were taken with each benthic sample con- si sting of the pooled contents of three grabs washed through a 500-wm mesh sieve and preserved in formalin. The total area sampled was ap- p proximately 0.07m . Surface and bottom temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen concentration were measured during each series of sample collec- tions. A Yellow Springs Instrument Model 33 STC meter was used to measure salinity and temperature, while a Model YSI 51A oxygen meter was used to measure dissolved oxygen concentration. For each set of trawls, three specimens of each species were se- lected and their standard length measured to the nearest mm. Each was then weighed to the nearest 0.1 g. The stomachs of these indi- vi duals were then removed for content analysis. The contents were sorted in a Petri dish, identified to the lowest taxonomic level practicable, food items enumerated and then oven dried at 60°C for 24 h. The zooplankton samples were subsampled volumetri cally. All or- 8 gani sms were then sorted and identified to the lowest taxonomic level practicable. The volume of water filtered by each net was then cal- O culated and the number of organisms/m calculated for each taxa. Benthic samples were emptied onto a 500mesh sieve for thor- ough washing and returned to the jar for staining with Rose Bengal. All organisms were sorted, identified to the lowest taxonomic level p practicable and counted. Organisms were then reported in number/m . Stomach contents were reported in four major food groups as in Chao and Musick (1977) and Hodson et al. (1981): macrozooplankton, microzooplankton, benthos, and fish. Unidentifiable material (organics) and plant debris (detritus) were also noted. Frequency of occurrence, percent composition by number, and percent composition by dry weight were determined. Diet overlap ) which indicates the extent to which two par- ticular species are utilizing the same prey items was calculated for each pair of fish using Schooner's index (Keast 1985): - 0.5 t=l in this equation P is the proportion of the i prey consumed by iÿJl species j, and is the proportion of the i prey consumed by species k. Diet breadth (B) which indicates the relative range of prey eaten was also calculated according to the method described by Keast (1985) : B = l/{Pi)^ 9 where is the proportion of the prey category. Ivlev's index of electivity (E), as described by Strauss (1979), was used in comparing food found in the stomach to that available for consumption. This index of electivity is stated as: where r^ is the proportion of the prey in the gut, and the proportion of the same prey in the environment. An analysis of variance was used to determine if any differences observed in feeding patterns according to season, time of feeding, or prey preference vyere significant (P _< 0.05). Prior to these analy- ses, an arc sine square root transformation was performed to achieve uniform variance of percentage data. RESULTS Hydrography The coldest water temperature recorded was 3.2°C during the win- ter of 1981, while the warmest temperature was 29.6°C recorded during the summer of 1982 (Table 2). Salinity fluctuated yearly with high values around 13 and 14 ppt during 1981 and low values around 7 and 8 ppt in 1982. Dissolved oxygen was inversely related to temperature with the low of 1.2 ppm recorded at night during the early summer. The highest values were observed during the day in the winter of 1982 and ranged between 10 and 13 ppm. Zooplankton Calanoid copepods {Aaavtia tonsa and Euvytemova affinis) dom- inated the zooplankton samples. Mean densities of approximately CO 2.3x10 /m and 1.6x10 /m were found during early spring and early summer (Table 3). Other abundant taxa included mysids, polychaete larvae, and barnacle nauplii during early spring and barnacle nauplii, grass shrimp, and harpacticoid copepods during early sum- mer. The densities of these abundant taxa each averaged between approximately 2.0xl0^/m^ and 5.0xl0^/m^. Benthos The dominant benthic organism throughout the study was chironomid larvae which had a peak abundance in late spring (Table 4). These were followed by capitellid polychaetes in early fall, and the spionid polychaetes in winter and early fall. Diversity was greatest during vrinter when 13 taxa were collected followed by late 11 Table 2. Seasonal surface (S) and bottom (B) water temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen (0.0.) values from Bond Creek during 1980 - 1982 studies. Tide Status Day Hi qh Day Low Ni ght Hi qh Niqht Low Season Parameter S B SB SB S B Late Fall '80 Temp. 13.8 14.0 14.1 14.6 13.2 14.0 13.0 14.0 Sal. 9.8 10.0 11.0 12.0 7.5 8.2 9.5 10.0 D.O. 10.6 10.4 9.5 10.2 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 Early Spri ng '81 Temp. 12.0 11.5 11.9 12.0 13.9 14.0 13.0 13.0 Sal. 14.4 13.8 13.1 13.2 13.2 13.7 13.5 13.0 D.O. 10.8 11.8 9.1 9.2 10.0 10.0 10.8 9.8 Early Summer '81 Temp. 26.5 26.0 29.2 26.0 28.5 28.0 26.8 26.0 Sal. 12.2 13.6 10.0 13.8 9.0 12.5 8.8 12.4 D.O. 8.7 4.6 9.4 8.0 10.3 9.0 3.6 1.2 Late Summer '81 Temp. 21.5 21.0 25.1 23.2 25.0 23.4 23.0 22.9 Sal. 14.0 13.8 14.4 12.6 13.5 11.1 13.6 13.5 D.O. 4.4 6.9 7.8 7.6 7.4 6.0 7.9 7.7 Wi nter '31 Temp. 3.2 4.5 3.5 4.0 4.6 5.2 5.4 5.8 Sal. 13.6 15.5 15.0 15.8 14.2 13.5 14.4 12.6 D.O. 12.5 9.9 12.2 12.3 12.4 11.9 11.5 10.0 Late Spri ng '82 Temp. 19.8 19.2 19.2 19.2 19.5 19.2 19.0 18.4 Sal. 6.8 6.8 7.2 7.2 7.4 7.0 7.2 6.8 D.O. 9.0 6.1 8.2 6.5 7.0 4.9 7.7 4.7 Summer '82 Temp.. 29.6 29.2 27.8 28.0 27.8 27.0 28.0 27.8 Sal. 8.2 8.3 7.6 7.5 8.0 8.0 8.2 8.2 D.O. 7.7 7.4 - - 5.9 5.7 8.0 7.6 Early Fall ' 82 Temp. 18.1 17.8 18.6 18.1 18.6 18.1 17.0 18.0 Sal. 8.0 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.2 8.4 7.4 8.1 D.O. 12.0 12.3 8.5 8.6 5.4 5.5 4.8 5.1 12 O Table 3. ¡lean densities (#/in 1 S.E.) of zooplankton collected during the day and night from two seasons in Bond Creek. Early Spring Early Summer Taxon Day Ni ght Day Ni ght Calanoid copepods (Day) 123,378 + 108,266 l.i309,422 + 2,164,205 (Night) 330,015 ^ 181,183 1, 296,129 571,693 My si ds 57 + 152 1C1,239 28,494 50 + 130 1049 2155 Polychaete larvae 3006 + 3039 7490 +_ 11,015 5 ± 8 8 18 Barnacle nauplii 3445 + 3544 380 1045 2715 ^ 5344 4131 6903 Grass shrimp 0 + 0 1515 ¿ 4200 3042 5621 1289 1339 Harpacticoid copepods 130 + 310 550 903 23 66 4233 7867 Barnacle cypri ds 341 + 471 69 194 1149 ^ 2498 797 1124 Crab zoea 0 + 0 0 L 0 283 396 768 +_ 857 Cyclopoid copepods 0 + 0 298 842 0 ± 0 530 1003 Ostracods 20 + 55 0 + 0 0 + 0 0 + 0 13 O Table 4. Mean densi ties(#/!n ± 1 S.E.) of benthic invertebrates by season collected from Bond Creek (total area sampled = 0.07m^). Phylurn 1981 1982 Speci es/Taxon Late Wi liter Late Summer Early Summer Spring Fall Rhynchocoela N erne r tea n 5±8 14±14 33134 Mol 1usca Pel ecypoda Maooma sp. 5±8 10±17 1961133 918 Maaomx siphons 10117 Annelida Polychaeta Phyllodoci dae 14±14 fJerei dae 14±14 24±42 24117 Capitellidae 9±3 11001332 19131234 323911244 Spi oni dae 450±356 27501872 10001145 25831739 Amp hare ti dae 77136 72150 Oligochaeta Nai di dae 4591502 513 Tubi fi ci dae 518 513 Arthropoda Insecta Chi ronomi dae 1. 1961133 13111296 49361395 5691187 Chironomidae p. 5±8 29114 Crustacea Ostra COda 513 Harpacti coi da 518 Covophium sp. 24130 513 Mysidopsis higelowi 10±17 518 62136 14 spring when 10 taxa were collected. Summer grabs were void of ben- thic organism. During the late summer, the spionids comprised over 64% of the total number of benthic invertebrates collected, followed by chiro- nomi d larvae with a percent relative abundance over 28% (Table 5). During the winter spionids comprised over 47% while chirononiid larvae and capitel lids comprised 23% and 19% of the total number respective- ly. Late spring grabs v;ere dominated by chironomid larvae with a percent relative abundance over 60%. Capitel lids comprised over 23% and spionids over 12% of the total number collected. The early fall grabs were dominated by capitel lids at 50% and spionids at 40%. Stomach Contents Spot - Stomachs of 37 spot collected during four seasons were examined. Food items were found in 92% (34) of these stomachs (Table 6). Polychaetes, ostracods, and nematodes were found in the stomachs during all seasons while mysids, chironomids, harpacti coi ds, cala- noids, cyclopoids, oli gochaetes, isopods and bivalve siphons were present in the stomachs during three of four seasons. Seasonally, harpacti coi ds, ostracods, nematodes, and chironoi.iid larvae were found in at least 75% of the stomachs containing food during late fall. However, mysids which occurred in only 62% of the stomachs made up over 40% of the contents when percent dry weight was calculated (Table 7). Chironomid larvae and fish comprised between 19% and 15% of the dry weight. Polychaetes and calanoids were found in 60% and 40% of the stomachs respectively while polychaetes, cala- noids, and isopods each comprised between 31% and 25% of the dry 15 Table 5. Seasonal relative abundance (%) by number of benthic inverte- brates collected from Bond Creek. 1981 1982 Phyl urn Late Late Early Sped es/Taxon Summer Wi nter Spring Summer Fall Rhynchocoela Nemertean Q.72 0,24 0.40 Mol lusca Pel ecypoda Maaoma sp. 0.72 0.17 2.39 0.14 Macona si phons 0.15 Annelida Polychaeta Phyl 1 odoci dae 0.24 fJerei dae 2.02 0.41 0.30 Capitellidae 1.30 13.97 23.36 49.75 Spi oni dae 64.84 47.43 12.21 39.75 Amp hare ti dae 1.33 0.88 01 i gochaeta Nai di dae 7.92 0.06 Tubi fi ci dae 0.09 0.06 Arthropoda Insecta Chi ronomi dae 1. 28.24 22.61 50.28 8.74 Chironomidae p. 0.72 0.44 Crustacea Ostracoda 0.09 Harpacticoi da 0.08 Covophium sp. 0.41 0.06 Mysidopsis higelowi 1.44 0.09 0.95 16 Table 6, Percentage of occurrence of different food items in the stomachs of spot containing food, collected during die! studies from Bond Creek during four seasons. Season Seasons Food Item Late Early Early Late Combi ned Fall Spring Summer Summer Macrozooplankton Mysids 62.5 8.3 33.3 26.5 Chironomid larvae 75.0 58.3 33.3 47.1 Dipteran pupae 11.1 2.9 Microzooplankton Harpacti coi ds 100.0 8.3 55.6 41.2 Calanoi ds 40.0 41.7 11.1 23.5 Cyclopoids 25.0 20.0 44.4 26.5 Copepodites 55.6 8.8 Ostracods 87.5 20.0 8.3 11.1 29.4 Barnacle cyprids 8.3 2.9 Benthos Polychaetes 25.0 60.0 75.0 44.4 52.9 01igochaetes 12.5 25.0 11.1 14.7 Amphi pods 37.5 11.1 11.8 Isopods 20.0 8.3 11.1 8,8 Mema todes 75.0 20.0 66.7 38.9 67.6 Bivalve siphons 20.0 75.0 11.1 32.4 Fi sh Gobi es 12.5 2.9 Seal es 33.3 11.1 14.7 Organics 75.0 40.0 25.0 66.7 50.0 Detritus 25.0 66.7 55.6 44.1 Al gae 25.0 5.9 Number fish examined 9 7 12 9 37 Number fish with food 8 5 12 9 34 17 Table 7. Percent dry weight of the stomach contents of spot from Bond Creek, [lean lengths of spot in mm are indicated. Season Late Early Early Late Seasons Food Item Fall Spring Summer Summer Combi ned X =104 7=24 7=63 7=89 Macrozooplankton My si ds 40.34 0.04 77.08 43.51 Chironomid larvae 18.86 8.85 2.32 9.16 Dipteran pupae 1.42 0.58 Microzoopiankton Harpacti coi ds 2.80 0.04 0.04 0.91 Calanoids 28.20 0.20 0.03 0.20 Cyclopoids 1.54 2.56 0.37 0.62 Copepodites 0.14 0.06 Ostracods 0.96 2.56 0.04 0.03 0.32 Barnacle cyprids 0.04 0.01 Benthos Polychaetes 0.42 30.77 41.73 16.74 19.10 Oligochaetes 0.38 0.12 0.03 0.16 Amphi pods 2.69 0.57 1.04 Isopods 25.64 0.40 0.28 0.35 Nematodes 0.23 2.56 1.04 0.48 0.58 Bivalve siphons 2.56 46.90 0.03 13.53 Fi sh Gobi es 15.37 4.61 Scales 0.16 0.03 0.06 Organics 16.25 5.13 0.12 0.17 5.01 Detri tus 0.08 0.32 0.14 0.17 Al gae 0.08 18 weight during the early spring. Polychaetes, bivalve siphons, and nematodes were present in over 66% of all the stomachs with bivalve siphons and polychaetes each comprising over 41% of the dry weight of all the stomach contents during early summer. Nematodes were the dominant organisms during late summer and were present in almost 89% of the stomachs. Mysids were found in only 33% of the stomachs but comprised over 77% of the dry weight. Overall, nematodes, polychaetes, and chironomid larvae were found most frequently in the stomachs of spot, while nysids dominated the percent dry weight at over 43% followed by polychaetes (19%) and Pi valve siphons (14%). No significant difference among ttie major food groups consumed by spot was observed (P <_ 0.Ü5; F=0.102). This suggest that spot utilized a wide range of prey and infers an opportunistic feeding be- havi or. Atlantic croaker - Stomachs of 51 croaker collected during five seasons were examined and over 88% (45) contained food (Table 8). Mysids, chironomid larvae and polychaetes were present in the stomachs during four of five seasons while harpacti coi ds, calanoids, and amphipods were found in the stomachs during three of five sea- sons. Seasonally, irysids and chironomid larvae were found in all sto- machs that contained food during late fall. Mysids comprised almost 49% of the dry weight while chironomid larvae comprised 27% (Table 9). Calanoids were present in over 77% of the stomachs and accounted for 48% of the total dry weight during early spring while mysids. 19 Table 8. Percentage of occurrence of different food items in the stomachs of Atlantic croaker containing food, collected during di el studies from Bond Creek during five seasons. Season Food Items Late Early Early Late Seasons Fall Spring Summer Summer Winter Combi ned Macrozooplankton My si ds 100.0 33.3 88.9 20.0 48.9 Chironomid larvae 100.0 11.1 75.0 100.0 64.4 Dipteran pupae 30.0 8.3 6.7 Palaemonid zoea 8.3 2.2 Crustacean zoea 8.3 2.2 Microzooplankton Harpacticoi ds 20.0 33.3 8.3 13.3 Calanoids 77.7 41.7 40.0 31.1 Cyclopoids 8.3 2.2 Ostracods 20.0 11.1 6.7 Benthos Polychaetes 20.0 22.2 75.0 88.9 46.7 Oligochaetes 30.0 75.0 26.7 Amp hi pods 10.0 22.2 11.1 6.7 Isopods 11.1 4.4 Nematodes 25.0 6.7 Bivalve siphons 75.0 11.1 22.2 Fi sh Anchovi es 11.1 2.2 Gobi es 10.0 11.1 4.4 Menhaden 22.2 4.4 Seal es 16.7 11.1 6.7 Organics 70.0 11.1 58.3 88.9 40.0 55.6 Detri tus 10.0 25.0 77.8 24.4 Sand 10.0 8.3 4.4 A1 gae 40.0 44.4 17.3 Number fi sh exami ned 10 9 12 9 11 51 Number fish with food 10 9 12 9 5 45 20 Table 9. Percent dry weight of the stomach contents of Atlantic croaker from Bond Creek. Mean lengths of Atlantic croaker in mm are i ndi cated. Season Late Early Early Late Seasons Food Item Fall Spri ng Summer Summer Winter Combined x=126 x=36 >70 mm SL) was noted by Koblinski and Sheridan (1979) in Apala- chicóla Bay, Florida and was supported in this study. Juvenile southern flounder and bay anchovy collected throughout the study did not follow the basic immigration - growth - emigration pattern shown by spot and Atlantic croaker. Flounder collected dur- ing winter and early spring had possibly overwintered in the creek system. Bay anchovy which spawn all year, were basically uniform in length during the study. Southern flounder fed on macrozooplankton (mysids) and fish almost exclusively. This feeding habit is in agreement with findings by Darnell (1953) and Powell and Schwartz (1979). Smaller bay anchovy are classified as zoopl ankti vores and as their length increases macrozooplankton become increasingly more important (Carr and Adams 1973; Schwartz 1979). In this study, microzooplankton dominated the stomach contents from all seasons except late fall when mysids and phytoplankton were more prevalent. Kinch (1979) noted a secondary piscivorous tendency among larger anchovies which was not substantiated in this study. 42 Similar diets for all four species suggest niche overlap was prevalent. However, spot and Atlantic croaker have wide diet breadths during the peak growing season of their preferred prey. This opportunistic feeding behavior allows for shifts in prey se- lection when primary prey items become difficult to obtain. Zoo- plankton abundances in this type of system are usually highest during early spring when larval fish begin establishing residence in the nursery areas (Thayer et al. 1974). Likewise (Turner 1981) has shown that rapid growth of larval spot coincides with peak plankton produc- ti on. Consequently, when spot and Atlantic croaker moved into Bond Creek, zooplankton were present in great numbers and were readily available. As these two species grew, chironomid larvae and bivalves became iircre abundant and accessible as prey. West (1985) in his studies of the benthos in Short Creek a tributary of South Creek also found high densities of chironomid larvae in late fall. A seasonal shift occurred in the diet of spot and Atlantic croaker toward these abundant prey. When the polychaetes (capitellids and spionids) ex- hi bi ted their highest peaks of abundance later in the year, they also became a major contributor to the diet of these species. Diel feeding patterns have been noted in many studies. Hodson et al. (1981) suggested juvenile spot collected from a tidally inun- dated marsh after their transition to the benthic feeding behavior, fed more actively at night. Likewise, this study showed that spot had a tendency to consume higher concentrations of benthos after sunset during four of the five seasons. Studies from Rose Bay, a system similar to Bond Creek, did not indicate however, any apparent 43 di el feeding pattern (Currin 1984). This shift towards benthos dur- i ng the night provides a greater variety in diet and less competition among these dominant fish species. The diet overlap combination of spot-Atlanti c croaker suggested a higher degree of diet overlap during their entire residence in the nursery area. However, the opportunistic feeding behavior of each, as evidenced by high diet breadths, allows both species to occupy similar niches. Atlantic croaker and southern flounder also utilized the same basic food group and consequently exhibited a similar high diet overlap. This suggests stiff competition for the preferred diet. Southern flounder, however, displayed a narrow diet breadth and actively selected mysids during early spring and early summer and actively avoided microzooplankton. Atlantic croaker on the other hand consumed large numbers of calanoid copepods (microzooplankton) in the spring and showed an affinity for mysids in the late summer while southern flounder were scarce during this period and fed inter- mi ttently. It has been noted that marine larvae and juveniles show low diet overlaps (Larouche 1932). The high diet overlap values experienced by these estuarine species suggest that competition potentially exists if resources were limiting, which in this creek apparently are not. The fact that food resources from this system were seasonal in abundance as evidenced by the high numbers of zooplankton during spring and summer while benthos were more abundant in the late fall and winter suggests that the food resources found in Bond Creek are not limited. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Spot and Atlantic croaker are both opportunistic feeders. Younger juvenile spot utilized nri crozoopl ankton and benthos before they switched to the opportunistic feeding behavior as older juveniles. The young Atlantic croaker utilized microzooplankton (calanoid copepods) exten- si vely before they also became an opportunistic feeder as older juven- iles. Spot displayed a diet breadth value of four while Atlantic croaker indicated a diet breadth value near three, both of which indi- cate a wide range of prey consumed. Southern flounder utilized macrozooplankton (mysids) extensively but also showed a secondary piscivorous feeding habit. Extensive uti li - zation of the macrozooplankton occurred during those seasons when the other species were consuming other preferred prey. A diet breadth value near one suggests the exclusive use of a single food source. Bay ancho- vy predmoninantly consumed zooplankton. Smaller bay anchovy(<40 mm SL) preferred microzooplankton (calanoid copepods) while the larger fish basically consumed macrozooplankton (mysids). A diet breadth near two emphasized the use of both categories of zooplankton. Zooplankton reached their peak abundance during the recruitment period of these predatory fish. Zooplankton consequently became the major food source during this time. The early summer growing season of these fish coincided v/i th high densities of benthos which were exten- sively consumed. After the benthic die off, the macrozooplankton then became the dominant food item eaten. Only small diel differences in the type of prey consumed was seen. The benthos were consumed more frequently at night by spot in the 45 early spring and late summer and in the early summer by Atlantic croaker. Mysids were the most selected prey using Ivlev's electivity index while the calanoid copepods were the most avoided prey except by the bay anchovy. The four species of fish often occupied similar niches during their residence in the nursery area. However, a seemingly unlimited food supply allowed these abundant fish populations to coexist. LITERATURE CITED Carr, W.E.S. and C.A. Adams. 1973. Food habits of juvenile marine fishes occupying seagrass beds in the estuarine zone near Crystal River, Florida. Trans. Am. Fish. Soa. 102:511-540. Chao, L.N. and J.A. Musick. 1977. Life history, feeding habits, and functional morphology of juvenile Sciaenid fishes in the York River Estuary, Virginia. Fish. Bull. 75:657-702. Christiansen, F.B. and T.M. Fenchel. 1977. Theories of populations in biological communities. Springer-Verlag, New York. 144p. Currin, B.M. 1984. Food habits and food consumption of juvenile spot, Leiostomus xanthurus and croaker, Miaropogonias undulatus in their nursery areas. Masters Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh. 103 p. Currin, B.M., J.P. Reed, and J.M. Miller. 1984. Growth, production, food consumption, and mortality of juvenile spot and croaker: a comparison of tidal and nonti dal nursery areas. Estuaries. 7:451- 459. Davis, G.J., H.D. Bradshaw, M.M. Brinson, and G.M. Lekson. 1985. Salinity and nutrient dynamics in Tacks, Jacobs, and South Creeks in North Carolina, October 1981 - November 1982. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 101:37-51. Darnell, R.M. 1958. Food habits of fishes and larger invertebrates of Lake Ponchartrai n, Louisiana, an estuarine community. Puol. Inst, i-lar. Sci., Univ. Texas. 5:353-416. 47 Detwyler, R. and E.H. Houde. 1970. Food selection by laboratory-reared larvae of the scaled sardine Havengula pensacolae (Pisces: Clupeidae) and the bay anchovy Anchoa mítchilli (Pisces: Engraulidae). Mar. 3iol. 7:214-222. Galat, Ü.L. and N. Vucinich. 1983. Food partitioning between young of the year of two sympatri c tui chub norphs. Trans. Am. Fish. Soo. 112:486-497. Gunter, G. 1961. Some relationships of estuarine organisms to salin- ity. Lirnnot. Oaeanogr. 6:182-190. Hobson, E.S. and J.R. Chess. 1976. Trophic interactions among fishes and zooplankters near shore at Santa Catalina Island, California. Fish. Bull. 74:567-598. Hodson, R.G., J.O. Hackman, and C.R. Bennett. 1981. Food habits of young spots in nursery areas of the Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 110:495-501. Keast, A. 1985. Development of dietary specializations in a summer community of juvenile fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 13:211-224. Kinch, J.C. 1979. Trophic habits of the juvenile fishes within arti - ficial waterways—Marco Island, Florida. Univ. Texas, Mar. Sci. Inst. 22:77-90. Kjelson, M.A., D.S. Peters, G.W. Thayer, and G.N. Johnson. 1975. The general feeding ecology of postlarval fishes in the Newport River Estuary. Fish. Bull. 73:137-144. 48 Kjelson, M.A. and G.N. Johnson. 1976. Further observations of the feeding ecology of postlarval pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides, and spot, Leiostorms xanthuvus. Fish. Bull. 74:423-432. Kobylinski, G.J. and P.F. Sheridan. 1979. Distribution, abundance, feeding, and long-term fluctuations of spot, Leiostorms xanthuvus, and croaker, Miovopogonias undulatus, in Apalachicola Bay, Florida, 1972-1977. Univ. Texas, Har. Sci. Inst. 22:149-161. Larouche, J.L. 1982. Trophic patterns among larvae of five species of seul pi ns (Family: Gotti dae) in a Maine estuary. Fish. Bull. 80:827-840. Lawson, T. 1981. Nursery area assessment of Bond, Long, and Short Creeks, Beaufort County, North Carolina. Annual report to Texasgulf Chemicals, Inc. 134pp. MacDonald, J.S. and R.H. Green. 1986. Food resource utilization by five species of benthic feeding fish in Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sai. 43:1534-1546. Miller, J.M., J.P. Reed, and L. Pietrafesa. 1984. Patterns, mechanisms and approaches to the study of migrations of estuarine-dependent fish larvae and juveniles. In J.D. McCleave, G.P. Arnold, J.J. Dodson, and W.H. Neill (eds.). Mechanisms of Migration in Fishes. Plenum Press, New York. 554pp. Overstreet, R.M. and R.W. Heard. 1978. Food of the Atlantic croaker, Miovopogonias undulatus, from Mississippi Sound and the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Res. Re, 6:145-152. 49 Powell, A.B. and F.J. Schwartz. 1979. Food of Paralickthys dentatus and P. lethostigrna (Pisces: Bothidae) in North Carolina estuaries. Estuaries. 2:275-279. Roelofs, E.W. 1954. Food studies of young Sciaenid fishes, Miaropogon and Leiostomus from North Carolina. Copeia 1954:151-153. Schoener, T.W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Saienoe. 185:27-39. Schwartz, F.J. 1980. Food analysis of selected fishes captured in Cape Fear Estuary and adjacent Atlantic Ocean, North Carolina. 1973- 1973. Tech. Rpt. to Carolina Power and Light, Vol. 8: Inst, of Mar. Sci., Uni v. of North Carolina, Morehead City, N.C. Strauss, R.E. 1979. Reliability estimates for Ivlev's electivity index, the forage ration, and a proposed linear index of food selection. Trans. Am. Fish. Soo. 108:344-352. Stickney, R.R., G.L. Taylor, and D.B. White. 1975. Food habits of five young southeastern United States estuarine Sciaenidae. Chesapeake Sai. 16:104-114. Thayer, G.W., D.E. Hoss, M.A. Kjelson, W.F. Hettler, Jr. and M.W. LaCroix. 1974. Biomass of zooplankton in the Newport River Estuary and the influence of postlarval fishes. Chesapeake Soi. 15:9-16. Thorman, S. 1983. Food and habitat resource partitioning between three estuarine fish species on the Swedish west coast. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 17:581-692. 50 Turner, R.E. 1981. Plankton and the distribution of fishes on the southeastern United States continental shelf. Seienae. 214:353- 354. Weinstein, M.P. 1979. Shallow marsh habitats as primary nurseries for fishes and shellfish. Cape Fear River, North Carolina. Fish Bull. 77:339-357. West, T. 1985. Abundance and diversity of benthic macrofauna in sub- tributaries of the Pamlico River Estuary. J- Elisha Mitchell Sai, Soa. 101:142-159.