Williams, Lola M • 9 INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND SOCIETY ISSUES INTO PHYSICAL SCIENCE. (Under the direction of Charles R. Coble) Department of Science Education, July, 1984. The purpose of this study was to develop and implement teaching modules that relate specific physical science knowledge and concepts to energy and society issues to improve student attitudes toward, and knowledge of, energy thus enabling the student to become more scientifically literate. This curriculum development study attempted to answer the following questions. 1. Are there any significant differences in the attitudes of physical science students concerning energy and society issues after exposure to study investigator developed modules? 2. Are there any statistically significant differences in the performance of physical science students on energy knowledge instruments after exposure to study investigator developed modules? The study group consisted of 50 students enrolled in two physical science classes during the 1982-83 academic year at Bear Grass School. The general method and instruments employed in this study were: Three modules relating energy and society issues were developed by this study investigator along with an Energy Attitude Instrument and three Energy Knowledge Instruments, one for each module. Students were pre-tested in February, 1983 for their attitudes toward energy and society issues. The instrument used was the Energy Attitude Instrument developed by the study investigator. Students were post-tested concerning their attitudes in May, 1983. They were pre-tested before each of the three Energy Modules were implemented and post-tested afterward. The instruments used were the three Energy Knowledge Instruments developed by the study investigator. The study group was exposed to a series of specialized activities designed to improve their attitudes and knowledge toward energy and society issues. Some of the techniques developed and implemented in the physical science classes were: 1. activity sheets designed to expose the students to energy and society issues relevant to their daily lives, such as energy reserves, alternate sources of energy, personal energy use and conservation, social and economic impact of energy development, land disruption, air and water quality, and radiation hazards ; 2. "hands-on" activities designed to reinforce and extend classroom exposure to the energy and society issues; 3. group investigations and role-playing situations designed to allow students to make energy-related value decisions; 4. use of audio-visual materials and games to supplement classroom discussion and activities. Two null hypotheses were tested in this study. Statistical analysis yielded the following results. 1. Using a percentage change comparison of the pre- and post-test responses, there were differences in the energy attitudes of physical science students after exposure to the three Energy Modules as measured by the Energy Attitude Instrument. 2. Using the t>test, there was a significant increase in the energy knowledge of the physical science students after exposure to the three Energy Modules as measured by the three Energy Knowledge Instruments. INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND SOCIETY ISSUES INTO PHYSICAL SCIENCE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Science Education East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Certificate of Advanced Studies by Lola M. Williams July, 1984 ï, x. loxmm : y t SABT CAROLINA UKïT; '' ‘ X 4 INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND SOCIETY ISSUES INTO PHYSICAL SCIENCE by Lola M. Williams APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS C¡r&-í^ Charles R. Coble, Ed.D. CHAIRMAN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE EDUCATION Floyd E.^Mattheis, DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF TABLES . v CHAPTER I. NATURE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 1 Defining the Problem 1 Purpose of the Study 8 Hypotheses 10 Definition of Terms 10 Limitations and Basic Assumptions 13 Study Variables 14 Organization of the Study 14 II. REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE 17 Definitions of Science 17 Elements of Science 20 Objectives of Science Instruction 22 General Goals of Education 23 General Goals of Science Education 24 Scientific Literacy 26 Values in Science Teaching 28 Social Aspects of Science 29 The Need for an Interdiscipiinary Curriculurn 30. . Science and Societal Issues 32 ii PAGE Examples of Programs Relatinq Science and Societal Issues 38 III. DESIGN OF THE STUDY 50 The Tested Hypotheses 50 Durati on of the Study 51 The Study Group 51 Description of the Treatment 52 Collection of the Data . . 56 Measurement of Study Progress 57 Procedure for Analysis of Data 59 IV. ANALYSIS OF THE DATA 62 Hypothesi s Concerní'ng the Attitude Toward Energy and Society Issues of Physical Science Students. 62 Hypothesi s Concerní' ng Performance of Physi cal Science Students on Energy Knowledge Instru- ments 68 V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 73 Summary 74 Conclusions 76 Imp 1ications 76 BIBLIOGRAPHY 79 APPENDIX A: TABLES AND TESTING INSTRUMENTS 83 APPENDIX B: ENERGY MODULES: DESCRIPTION, ACTIVITIES, RESOURCES . 109 i i i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the supervisor of my thesis, Dr. Charles R. Coble, for his encouragement and continued guidance through the long hours it took to enable this paper to become a reality. He, along with other members of the committee, systematically examined the instruments and modules being developed and made valuable suggestions. I extend special thanks to Dr. Robert L. Dough for making some of his energy resources available. I also thank the remaining members of my committee, Dr. William B. Martin, Dr. Floyd E. Mattheis, and Dr. Floyd M. Read for their aid and support in the preparation and completion of this paper. To my dearest friend who has helped me realize my true worth as an individual, I dedicate this thesis, with all my love. iv TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Reliability of Tests as Computed By the Kuder- Richardson Formula 60 2. Energy Attitude Instrument Pre- and Post-Percentage Responses 65 3. Energy Knowledge Instruments Summary of Means . . . . 69 4. ^t-Test Analysis of the Energy Knowledge Instruments . . 71 5. Energy Attitude Instrument Pre-Test Responses 84 6. Energy Attitude Instrument Post-Test Responses .... 85 7. Energy Knowledge Instrument Module I Summary of Pre- Test and Post-Test Scores 86 8. Energy Knowledge Instrument Module II Summary of Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores 87 9. Energy Knowledge Instrument Module III Summary of Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores 88 10. Energy Knowledge Instruments a t-Test Analysis Based on Pre-Test and Post-Test Data 89 v CHAPTER I NATURE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY Defining the Problem A review of the literature expresses a major need for science educators to correlate efforts to relate science and society. This expression begins with some of the definitions of science. Barber (1952) indicated that a systematic way of understanding science is needed. One way to gain this systematic understanding of science "is to consider it first and fundamentally as a social activity, as a set of behaviors taking place in a human society" (p. 26). Barber (1952) later states, "Seeing science as a social activity can direct our attention more fruitfully to some of the ‘social problems' of science. . . . This is only to say what everyone knows . . . . that science has social consequences" (p. 27). Boulding (1975) states that science is a revelation which is firmly embedded in human society and must be visualized as a phenomenon taking place as far as we know, wholly within human society. We have to regard science ... an expanding movement within the social system (p. 201). . . . From its small beginning, science, like other great (movements) has expanded until it is world- wide in its scope and enormously influential (p. 203). James Rutherford proposes four main thrusts that science education should be taking in the future. Two of these are relevant to a 2 science-society curriculum: the interaction between science and our culture and systematic knowledge about teaching and learning science. Rutherford states, "Science teachers and scientists believe science is a way of learning about the world and that science will contribute to the solution of social problems. There needs to be more thoughtful concern in the science classroom for social problems" (Man, Science, Society: An Alliance Of Hope: The 1975 NSTA Convention, p. 21). Rutherford indicates that gaining and applying systematic knowledge about teaching and learning science must be improved. He states: We operate largely on folklore instead of learning how one learns. Much of our educational research isn't relevant to the classroom, but it is greatly needed. . . . Each of us should realize there is no one else to solve them. We must work collectively and pool our resources. ... In attacking these problems, we must remember that diversity is the key. No one solution will fit everything (Man, Science, Society: An Alliance of Hope: The 1975 NSTA Convention, p. 23). Hounshell and Coble (1979) state the following: We see an important relationship between science education and a larger societal need--a citizenry that is determined to solve the array of problems that threaten our future existence, not only as a free people, but as a species. The threats of 3 Wholesale famine, environmental degradation, and nuclear destruc- tion are real and growing. It is largely the responsibility of our schools to encourage the curiosity, determination, and investigative skills necessary to meet these threats success- fully. These are the same qualities that serve as the foundations of the scientific community (p. 17). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s (An NSTA Position Statement) (1982) makes the following declaration: "The goal of science education during the 1980s is to develop scientifically literate individuals who understand how science, technology, and society influence one another, and who are able to use this knowledge in their everyday decision making" (p. 2). Many traits are considered to be typical of a scientifically literate person. The NSTA Position Statement mentioned above and Carin and Sund (1980) point out that these attributes or characteristics can be thought of as describing a continuum along which the individual may progress. The progress of the individual's science education needs to be equated with progress along this continuum. Traits of a scientifically literate person are listed in the review of the literature in Chapter II. Gardner (1979) indicates that science educators generally agree that the purpose of education is to prepare students for life. Therefore, "they must develop courses to promote general scientific literacy" (p. 30). Willett and Roy (1982) indicate that few of the thousands of students in the United States who achieve high school diplomas each 4 year can be considered scientifically literate. They do not "under- stand the natural processes of science or the characteristics, philosophy, humanity, and moral values of the scientific community. High school curricula are not tailored to address these aspects of scientific literacy" (p. 33). Hurd (1975) believes that the science-based human problems in the world today, including environmental management, population control, health, food production, and energy resources are inade- quately dealt with because of a lack of personal and social commit- ment. He states: Our greatest deprivation in America today is a paucity of values which can be used for responsible decision-making and for indicating directions in which we should be moving. Students express this condition in the many efforts they make to find "who they are and what life is all about" (p. 28). Hurd (1975) goes on to indicate that science has a value dimension most of the time because it "induces conflicts in our thinking, modifies the culture, or makes demands on society" (p. 28). In regard to teaching science with a value focus, Hurd (1975) states: Teaching science with a value focus provides students with a means of interpreting what they have learned within their own experiences. This kind of learning makes it possible for students to become self-adaptive as science-related social conditions change. Knowledge is able to resolve most of the science-based social problems rampant in the world today 5 (p. 28). . . .The goals we set for the science courses we teach are the images of a future state, where we hope the student will be at some time. Yet we have not written science curricula this way. We review the past and leave out the future. ... As science teachers we have an obligation to help young people plan for and find themselves in a world yet to be. . . . The task is to invent and then mold the future to suit human needs, but within a firm system of moral and ethical considerations (p. 30). Hurd (1975) feels that when science is taught in relation to society, technology, and people, an interdisciplinary curriculum is needed. He writes, "We have little hope of resolving population, food, health, water pollution, and many other problems of human concern unless we can relate disciplines and teach them in an integrative mode" (p. 30). Science and Engineering Education for the 1980s and Beyond (1980) states there is a desperate need for curricula for the students who are not interested in pursuing professional scientific careers. A giant mismatch exists between the content of secondary school science courses and the needs and interests of students for whom these courses will constitute their entire formal scientific education. Most of these courses are not directed toward personal or societal problems involving science and technology. New teaching materials in science need to be developed for the many secondary students. The curriculum materials could focus on the science basic to the essential national 6 problems of energy, natural resources and health. Wolke (1975), writing in regard to the need for science and society programs and materials states that: To teach science only as a body of knowledge or even as a facet of culture . . . is to ignore the vital educational function: That of showing the student . . . how the science he is studying relates to and affects the greater operation of the society in which he lives. This interrelationship of science and society must be a deliberate part of at least one of the . . . science courses taken (p. iv). Nalence (1980) indicates there have been efforts to introduce science-society courses into the science curriculum, but they have met with only limited success. He suggests that the reason it is so difficult to introduce science-society materials that are so obvious- ly necessary to secondary schools is that the product of the efforts, though carefully designed and developed, never reaches the intended consumer--the classroom teacher. He states: "It is therefore, necessary that information and teaching models related to the science- society issues become a part of the teacher education at all levels-- undergraduate, graduate, and in-service" (p. 27). The reason for this need, Nalence expresses, is that the teacher is expected to absorb large amounts of materials, often from an unfamiliar discipline. He suggests as an example one set by his school district--Maple Newton School of Newton Square, Pennsylvania. This was the funding of two summer curriculum workshops for physics teachers to develop several 7 four-to-five week minicourses relating science, technology, and social issues. The most popular minicourses were those relating to energy and the environment. Social issues were emphasized as much as the technical information. Carin and Sund (1980) state that the science studies selected should relate as much as possible to the everyday life and activities of the students. They name one topic for selection as energy edu- cation. Kuhn (1978) gives four elements that should characterize any energy education program: 1. Energy education should be interdisciplinary. . . . 2. Energy education should relate to the everyday life of children. . . 3. Energy education should consider attitudes, values, and decision making. . . . (Carin & Sund, 1980), p. 66; Kuhn, 1978, p. 32). . . 4. Energy education should be future oriented and stress alternatives. . . . (Carin & Sund, 1980, p. 66; Kuhn, 1978, p. 33). Kuhn (1978) states, "Energy education is challenging, It com- bines study of the past, present, and future by building upon (not diluting) fundamental scientific information and concepts, It is, at once, a concern and an opportunity" (p. 33). Kuhn quotes A. Craig Phillips who states: One of the best ways to deal with a crisis is to consider it 8 an opportunity. From this point of view, the energy crisis provides almost endless possibilities for children to learn about the universe, civilization, and themselves. Energy, after all, is what makes all things go. . . By studying the energy crisis, students can see where humanity has been, where it is now, and where it might be going. (Kuhn, 1978, p. 33; Phillips, 1974; p. i). Purpose of the Study The central purpose of this study is to develop and implement teaching modules that relate specific physical science knowledge and concepts to the energy and society issues to improve student attitudes toward, and knowledge of, energy thus enabling the student to become more scientifically literate. This curriculum development study attempted to answer the following questions. 1. Are there any significant differences in the attitudes of physical science students concerning energy and society issues after exposure to study investigator developed modules? 2. Are there any statistically significant differences in the performance of physical science students on energy know!- edge instruments after exposure to study investigator developed modules? A thorough review of the literature related to this study is presented in Chapter II. The literature has shown that science educators 9 need his to d know oped Inst modIIIIItI.o..EEdo more to relate science and society issues. Since textbookstoriWcnnahelelayrrggt hyyave not done this, the study investigator attemptede645ve...SRElounepgsrigetceeahasrmcctheheindngt modules which relate specific physical sciencele87d..gCAeudardnridictiuoclonunamclepts of energy to the science-society literature.Three modules relating energy and society issues were devel-by the study investigator along with an Energy Attituderument and three Energy Knowledge Instruments, one for eachule. The three modules are entitled:is Energy?SourcesConsumption and ConservationThe following information was a part of each module:1. Title2.Rationale3.Objectives ActivitiesActivitiesActivitiesResourcesResources Some of the techniques developed and implemented in the physical science classes using the modules are: 1. activity sheets designed to expose the students to energy and society issues relevant to their daily lives> such as energy reserves, alternate sources of energy, personal energy 10 use and conservation, social and economic impact of energy development, land disruption, air and water quality, and radiation hazards; 2. "hands-on" activities designed to reinforce and extend classroom exposure to the energy and society issues; 3. group investigations and role-playing situations designed to allow students to make energy-related value decisions; 4. use of audio-visual materials and games to supplement classroom discussion and activities. Hypotheses This study is concerned with two null hypotheses. 1. There is no significant difference in the attitudes of physical science students concerning energy and society issues after exposure to study investigator developed modules, as measured by the Energy Attitude Instrument. 2. There is no statistically significant difference in the performance of physical science students on Energy Knowl- edge Instruments after exposure to study investigator developed modules, as measured by three Energy Knowledge Instruments. Definition of Terms The terms which have special meaning with respect to this study are the following. 11 Science is defined by Fischer (1975) as "the body of knowledge obtained by methods based on observation" (p. 6). Processes of science are, according to Carin and Sund (1980), observing, identifying problems, formulating hypotheses, designing and carrying out experiments, interpreting data, and using other forms of scientific reasoning. Products of science are considered by Carin and Sund (1980) as the data collected through the processes of science and used to formulate concepts, principles, and theories. Scientific literacy According to Hurd (1975), one who is scientifically literate is capable of using what has been learned about science for cultural adaptation and social progress. He or she should be able to effect rational action on science-based social and personal problems. Social aspects of science as stated by Carin and Sund (1980) are perceptions of the cultural conditions within which science thrives, recognition of the need to view the scientific enter- prise within broad perspectives of culture, society, and history, expectation that social and economic innovations may be necessary to improve man's condition, and appreciation of the universality of scientific endeavors (p. 41). Energy To Kranzberg (1975), "energy is more than a physical phenomenon. The way in which energy is produced, controlled, and applied—used 12 and misused—helps to determine the nature of society" (p. 10). Energy education has five basic elements according to Kuhn (1978). These are "information, concepts, attitudes and values, decision making, and action. (Carin & Sund, 1980, p. 66; Kuhn, 1978, p. 32). Energy-related social issues were identified by McCormack (1982) as "energy supply and conservation; the limited resources of land, water, minerals and fuel; pollution . . . the threat of nuclear . . . war" (p. 9). Issues related to the energy problem by Fowler (1975) were the categories of energy consumption, the end uses of energy, the sources of energy and problems of energy supply (oil importation, natural gas ) air pollution, sulfur smog, the automobile and air pollution, competition for water, land use, ocean use, nuclear energy, radioactive pollution. Energy Attitude Instrument is an instrument developed by the study investigator and judged by a university faculty panel to be effective in measuring the favorable and unfavorable responses of physical science students to energy attitude questions before and after exposure to study investigator developed modules. Energy Knowledge Instrument is an instrument developed by the study investigator and judged by a university faculty panel to be effective in measuring the knowledge of physical science students toward energy-related social issues before and after exposure to study investigator developed modules. Module is a set of activities developed by the study investigator 13 that relate specific physical knowledge and concepts to the energy and society issues. The modules were designed to enable the students to become more scientifically literate. Limitations and Basic Assumptions The methods of classroom treatment were administered during the 1982-83 academic year to physical science students grouped into two classes. Pre-test attitude measures were administered to the study group during February, 1983. Pre-test knowledge measures were administered before each of the three Energy Modules: Module I, February, 1983; Module II, February, 1983; Module III, March, 1983. Proposed classroom treatment was utilized with the study group. Post-test attitude measures were administered during May of 1983 and compared to the pre-test results for the study group, Post- test knowledge measures were administered during February, March, and May, 1983 and compared to the pre-test results for the study group. This study was limited to an analysis of data collected from 50 students enrolled in physical science at Bear Grass School. While the results are limited to this described population, they may be generalized to analogous populations receiving the same treatment. In addition, this study was based upon the following assumption. The instruments employed for measuring the attitudes and knowl¬ edge of physical science students toward energy and society issues were assumed to be valid to the extent they measured that which they 14 claimed to measure. A description of these instruments has been included in Chapter III. Study4231VariablesT5he study group was exposed to activities in the areas ofenergy,.....“energy sources, and energy consumption and conservation.The indiRGAvAHiuordacodluentuiaiod-vppls-ivlt-alyoiesson plans utilized contained introductory,developmental, and concluding activities as well as enrichment andresearch activities. For the purpose of this study, the introductory,developmental, and concluding activities were utilized with thestudy group. The group was exposed to fifty-minute periods ofactivities during every regular school day during the research study.The uncontrolled variables in this study were the study groupitself and pupil bias.Manipulatedsynvui"naargliables in this study were the author's methodsof classroom treatment.sheetsactivitiesinvestigationssituationsmaterials 6.Games Organization of the Study A seven-step process was involved in the organization of this study: 15 1. A review of the related literature; 2. Collection and review of activities that related specific physical science knowledge and concepts to energy and society issues; 3. Development of an Energy Attitude Instrument; 4. Development of three Energy Knowledge Instruments; 5. Implementation of appropriate procedures for the collection of data; 6. Analysis and presentation of the data; 7. Presentation of the summary, conclusions, and implications. Chapter II includes: (a) a review of the definitions of science, (b) a review of the elements of science, (c) a review of the objec- tives of science instruction, (d) a review of the general goals of education, (3) a review of the general goals of science education, (f) a review of the traits considered to be typical of a scientif- ically literate person, (g) a review of values in science teaching, (h) a review of social aspects of science, (i) a review of the need for an interdisciplinary curriculum, (j) a review of science and societal issues in the three areas of environmental, energy, and health-related and other issues. Chapter III explains the design of the study, including the hypotheses to be tested, the population studied, the procedures for collecting data, and descriptions of the instruments and strategies used in the study, Finally, the statistical methods used in the study to analyze the data are explained. 16 Chapter IV presents the tested hypotheses and the results of the statistical analyses. Chapter V includes a summary of the study, conclusions inferred from analyses of the data and implications which appear relevant. A bibliography as well as appendices containing tables, instruments, and modules of activities used are included at the end of the study. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE Definitions of Science According to Fischer (1975), the word science is frequently used in the everyday oral and written communication of most people. Every- one has some experiential awareness of the concept that this word represents. But, considerable difficulty exists in developing a simple and precise definition. Fischer (1975) felt that it was important to express a working definition of science that may be properly considered more as a description than as a precise definition and that the definition should not be taken too seriously beyond its pragmatic utility in clarifying the concepts that it represents and in enabling us to communicate with each other about it (p. 4). Fischer (1975) assumed as the working definition of science: "Science is the body of knowledge obtained by methods based on observation" (p. 6). Four significant implications of this defini- tion by Fischer (1975) are as follows: 1. The practice of science is a human activity. . . . 2. There is an inherent limitation of science (p. 6). . . . 3. There is an authority in science. . . . 4. There is a building upon that authority (p. 7). Barber (1952) indicated that a systematic way of understanding science is needed as well as a means of relating the diverse nature 18 of science to the underlying integrated unit of it. He stressed that science is not a randomly collected assortment of elements and acti vi ties. Instead it is a coherent structure in which the parts have functionally interdependent relations. When he addressed the National Science Teachers Association's 26th Annual National Convention in Washington, D. C. in 1978, Carl Sagan stated in regard to teaching students, "It is a task made easier, however, by the fact that humans are scientific beings; that is, our intellectual and emotional makeup, our evolution through natural selection predisposes us to science, which, after all, is Latin for knowledge" (Sagan, 1978, p. 29). He went on to state, "There has never been a greater need, therefore, for general scientific literacy and for competency in science teaching. I see science as having three major characteristics which we need to convey to our students" (p. 29). These were: First, as I have said, science is a power which can transform the world. Second, science offers a unique method (p. 29), an approach to dealing with difficult problems. . . . Third, science is a delight, a thing of great interest in its own right, Too often science is thought of as a discipline where, sometimes, the most naive questions can form the seed of revolutionary discovery (p. 30). Two authors, Barber (1952) and Fischer (1975), referred to Conant1s definition of science. Fischer quoted Conant as saying, 19 "Science is an interconnected series of concepts and conceptual schemes that have been developed as a result of experimentation and observations" (p. 9). Conant's definition, according to Fischer (1975), described something about scientific methods and stressed "the dynamic character of scientific knowledge by designating the present state of knowledge as the basis for future operations" (p. 9). Barber (1952) stated, "Without adequate conceptual schemes, scientific research is either blind or fruitless. President Conant has demonstrated this essential fact of science with examples from the history of science" (p. 37). Carin and Sund (1980) stated as the working definition of science: . . science is a human activity that is evolved as an intellectual tool to facilitate describing and ordering the environment. Once one accepts the idea that science does not exist in any other realm but the mind, it ceases to be a "thing", an entity with its own existence. Though scientific truth or fact is ideally objective, it is subject to human perception and logic. ... As a method, science is relatively stable and universally applied, while as a body of knowledge it is constantly changing (p. 2). To Hounshell and Coble (1979), science is as basic as reading, writing and arithmetic. In their article, they stated: It is basic because we live in an age of science and technology made possible through scientific discoveries. It is basic 20 because we are ourselves, exemplary scientific phenomena--a prime example of life itself. It is basic because our environ- ment . . .is science. It is basic because through science we can learn to think and to act rationally (p. 16). Elements of Science Carin and Sund 0980) listed three major elements of science: attitudes, processes or methods, and products. Some of the attitudes of science listed were curiosity, humility, skepticism, open-minded¬ ness, positive approach to failure, and objectivity. The two pointed out that the only certainty in scientific work is uncer- tainty and change. They indicated a scientist usually makes this discovery when he realizes failure is but a "temporary stopping place on the continuum of research" (p. 5). In regard to this, Asimov (1978) put it very aptly: I personally dread the day when there is no more wonder in the universe, no new problems to be addressed. What a dull universe it will be for that generation which solves the last problem. Happily, I believe there is enough complexity in the world to amuse human beings for all time.(Asimov, 1978, p. 27). The degree to which scientists use the scientific attitudes as listed by Carin and Sund (1980) to carry out investigations will determine how successfully they will be able to use the processes of science to make significant discoveries. According to Carin and Sund 0980), the processes of science include observing, identi- fying problems, formulating hypotheses, designing and carrying out 21 experiments, interpreting data, and using other forms of scientific reasoning. Scientists are continually seeking to identify "cause and effect" relationships between seemingly independent and frag- mented collected data" (Carin and Sund, 1980, p. 8). The data collected through the processes of science become the products of science. According to Heimler and Price (1977), "the product of science is information—the facts discovered and ideas developed by people using the process of science. The product of science exists in science books, journals, tapes, films, and other records" (p. 3). Birnie (1975) indicated that science educators must answer a number o products • Aabcf... craWDAndre yrohueiccial questions. Of these, two are related to theprhocesses of science and are:ou presenting a balance between products and processes?you think of the process of science as methods ofinquiry and attitudes?comes first, the product or the process?precepts and facts being used to develop concepts and conceptual schemes? . . • Is the curriculum within reach of most students? . . a. Is your evaluation dictated by objectives beyond these traditionally emphasized: knowledge, comprehension, and applications? b. If the school does not present the student with the products of science (facts, concepts, principles, laws) 22 are there persons or institutions to fill the void? (p. 15). Objectives of Science Instruction In outlining objectives for science, Carin and Sund (1980) combined objectives from the 1947 publication, the Forty-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, entitled "Science Education in American Schools" and a 1964 report of the Commission of Science Education of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science. The objectives were grouped into six major categories by Carin and Sund (1980): (1) knowledge, (2) instrumental skills, (3) problem-solving skills, (4) scientific attitudes, (5) appreciations, and (6) interests. Pupils should be better able to achieve these objectives after completing a science course: 1. Knowledge. Read and state the meaning of certain scientific facts and concepts. Show that they can apply scientific principles. . . 2. Instrumental skills. Manipulate basic science equipment, interpret and prepare maps, graphs, charts, and tables appropriate to problems. 3. Science process. Demonstrate problem solving skills such as observing, inferring . . • 9 making hypothses, outlining scientific procedures to test hypotheses, carrying out an investigation. . . 23 4. Scientific attitudes. Demonstrates scientific attitudes such as open mindedness. . . 5. Appreciations. Describe the uses, benefits, and limita- tions of science to society. 6. Interests. Indicate interest by reading, collecting, studying, or becoming involved in some scientific activity as a leisure-time pursuit (p. 39). Shrigley (1983) received these comments about science from teachers he surveyed: Science develops logical and critical thought . . . provides hands-on experience necessary in inquiry learning . . . motivates the learner . . . enriches other curricular areas . . . helps us to cope with technological crises, and . . enriches the conceptual understanding of the physical and natural environment (p. 430). General Goals of Education Carin and Sund(1980) used as their source for some of the more general goals of all education the "NSTA Position Statement on School Education for the 70's". According to Anderson and Brown (1977), this position statement was prepared by the NSTA Committee on Curriculum Studies K-12 to serve as a guide for curriculum develop- ment in science education during the 1970s. As stated by Carin and Sund (1980), the goals are as follows: • learning how to learn, how to attack new problems, how to 24 acquire new knowledge • using rational processes • building competence in basic skills • developing intellectual and vocational competence • exploring values in new experiences • understanding concepts and generalizations • learning to live harmoniously within the biosphere Above all, the school must develop in the individual an ability to learn under his own initiative and an abiding interest in doing so (p. 40). General Goals of Science Education Anderson and Brown (1977) indicated that there are many lists of goals of teaching available. They indicated the most useful and productive ones are based upon the needs of the students. The lists usually included both physiological and psychological needs. Some needs listed were love, security, a positive and realistic self- concept, and a sense of responsibility. A word of caution was given to be sure whatever list of goals of teaching one subscribes to that he/she carefully considers both the present and future lives of the students. The reason for this is our society is so rapidly changing that it is impossible for one to predict with certainty the roles his/her students will fill in it. Rutherford (1978) stated during the 1978 NSTA Convention: We can't reproduce the "golden era" of the late 1960s. But our 25 new mission is as exciting as any we've had. As more and more people in our society come to understand the beauty of science, and its value to them as human beings, and as increased know!- edge helps us all make better decisions of the sort that determine our lives, our citizens will see that it is essential to support science and science education for their children (Rutherford, 1978, p. 31). The same "NSTA Position Statement on School Education for the 70s" was used by Anderson and Brown (1970) and Carin and Sund (1980) to state the goals of science education as follows: The major goal of science education is to develop scientifically literate and personally concerned individuals with a high competence for rational thought and action. This choice of goals is based on the belief that achieving scientific literacy involved the development of attitudes and process skills and concepts, necessary to meet the more general goals of education (p. 39). As stated in "Science-Technology-Society: An NSTA Position" (1982), the NSTA Board of Directors adopted the Position Statement "Science-Technology-Society : Science Education for the 1980s" in April, 1982. This position statement stated that science education should achieve these five fundamental goals over the next decades: a. to develop scientific and technological process and inquiry skills; b. to provide scientific and technological knowledge; 26 c. to use the skills and knowledge of science and technology as they apply to personal and social decisions; d. to enhance the development of attitudes, values, and appreciations of science and technology; and e. to study the interactions among science-technology- society in the context of science-related societal issues (p. 1). Scientific Literacy Many traits were considered to be typical of a scientifically literate person. The traits listed by Carin and Sund (1980) were very similar to the ones listed in Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s, An NSTA Position Statement. Some of the traits listed were: • uses science concepts, process skills, and values in making responsible everyday decisions; • understands how society influences science and technology as well as how science and technology influence society; • recognizes the limitations as well as the usefulness of science and technology in advancing human welfare; • knows the major concepts, hypotheses, and theories of science and technology in advancing human welfare; • appreciates science and technology for the intellectual stimulus they provide; 27 • understands that the generation of scientific knowledge depends upon the inquiry process and upon conceptual theories; • distinguishes between scientific evidence and personal opinions; • recognizes the origin of science and understands that scientific knowledge is tentative, and subject to change as evidence accumulates; . . . * has a richer and more exciting view of the world as a result of science education, and * knows reliable sources of scientific and technological information and uses these sources in the process of decision- making (p. 2). Blumenfeld (1976) stated that there was a need to "produce a scientifically informed citizenry, one capable of making decisions in a world beset by technological and social problems" (p. 17). In 1978, Rowe stated, "To borrow the ecological metaphor, the goal is to create a wider spectrum of productive niches. Presumably, then more students would take more science—and we would be one step closer to general scientific literacy" (p. 28). Rice and Dunlap (1982) stated a common objective in junior high science program is the development of research skills. Such programs "foster scientific literacy, enabling students to develop into adults capable of understanding the impact of science on society" (p. 56). The importance of scientific literacy has been stressed by many according to Willett and Roy (1982). One example given was the Rockefeller Foundation's Commission on the Humanities which asserted 28 that "scientific literacy is no less vital characteristic of an educated person than his or her ability to read or write" (p. 33). Values in Science Teaching Four different sources referred to a list of the values that underlie science that were identified in an essay by J. Dudley Herron entitled Education and the Spirit of Science. These were Birnie (1978); Carin and Sund (1980); Fischer (1975); and Herron (1977). The list was as follows: • Longing to know and to understand; * Questioning of all things; ' Search for data and their meanings; • Demand for verification; • Respect for logic; • Consideration of premises; • Consideration of consequences (Birnie, 1978, p. 31; Carin and Sund, 1980, p. 40; Fischer, 1975, p. 11; Herron, 1977, p. 30). Strong (1975) stated that some would agree with the Nobel Prize- winning chemist, E. B. Chain who said that the activities of science were morally and socially value-free, He considered science to be the pursuit of natural laws which are valid irrespective of the nation, race, politics, religion, or class position of their discoverers. Strong stated: The uses to which society may put science may be good or evil, the scientist carries no special responsibility for those users, 29 save as a normal citizen. The two-edged sword of science is fashioned for whomsoever will pick it up and wield it (p. 198). Boulding (1975) stated that perhaps the most striking character- istic of science is the high value which it puts on veracity-- abstaining from deliberate lies. He also stated, "Another high value in science is curiosity, although it is not highly regarded in many folklore cultures—as folk proverbs indicate, curiosity killed the cat" (p. 203). Hurd (1975) stated, "Science provides knowledge; technology provides ways of using this knowledge; and our value concepts guide what we ought to do with both" (p. 29). Social Aspects of Science Blumenfeld (1976) and Carin and Sund (1980) both made reference to the list of items included in the NSTA Position Statement, "School Education for the 70s" for an awareness of the social aspects of science. These were stated by Carin and Sund (1980) as follows: • perception of the cultural conditions within which science thri ves * recognition of the need to view the scientific enterprise within broad perspectives of culture, society, and history • expectation that social and economic innovations may be necessary to improve man's condition • appreciation of the universality of scientific endeavors (p. 41). 30 Ziman (1975) stated that social responsibility in science rests upon the way in which scientists are made. It is not a subject one can learn from a course of lectures. He stated: It is not something one can practice by saying "I think I shall go out and do some social responsibility this afternoon. Anyone coming with me?" . . .It is an attitude of mind, a sensibility of the spirit implicit in educational systems in personal relations in institutional policies (p. 207). The Need For an Interdisciplinary Curriculum Economists have pointed out the need for emphasizing the practical because of society's increasing need for lifelong learners. The question is how this can be accomplished. In regard to this Andersen (1978) stated: But how can science teachers possibly give their students an integrated view of science . . .? Where does one start? One approach to integrated science teaching is the holistic method, which takes the interests and concerns of the students as a starting point. . . .The rationale behind the model is quite simple. Science is a discipline with many dimensions: aesthetic, empirical, futuristic, historical, philosophical, and technolog- i cal. Each student's "interest orientation" will match at least one of these perspectives. Thus, every student can be placed in a science learning situation which matches his or her interest orientation, and, consequently, he or she will learn more science (p. 28). 31 Evans (1977) challenged the assumption that education in the future could be described as predetermined and set. He did not agree with some that the best educators could do was to try to project what was ahead and start making the necessary adjustments. He suggested that science educators could decide the future of science as a discipline while possessing full knowledge of the alternatives and of the degree of consensus for any particular objec- tive. In order to do this, Evans felt it was necessary to speculate about trends that would be shaping the society of America as far ahead as the year 2000. He stated, "the objectives of education will obviously have to mesh with larger social realities" (p. 28). Evans gave some examples of the kind of future that is likely. These were expressed in terms of political, economic, and social factors along with predictions for population growth and a knowledge expío- sion. He suggested that as far as the future of science, certain educational goals and strategies should be established. He stated, "in view of the future that seems likely, I think our overall educa- tional objectives should be to help our children become self-reliant, intellectually curious, and critical; sensitive to the needs of others and environmentally aware" (p. 29). He gave a list of twenty suggested educational strategies for the science of the future. These related to his predictions for the future stressing the need for an interdisciplinary approach to science. Carin and Sund (1980) stressed that if science and values are integrated with other disciplines, students should become "truer, 32 kinder, gentler, warmer, humbler, firmer, stronger, and wiser"(p. 65). Toffler (1970) stressed the need for new arrangements of subject matter for solving the world's problems in this manner, "Tomorrow's schools must therefore teach not merely data, but ways to manipulate i t. Students must learn how to discard old ideas, how and when to replace them. They must in short, learn how to learn" (p. 355). Also in regard to the education of the future, Toffler stated: For education the lesson is clear: its prime objective must be to increase the individual's cope-ability—the speed and economy with which he can adapt to continual change. And the faster the rate of change, the more attention must be devoted to discerning the pattern of future events, It is not even enough ... to understand the present, for the here-and-now environment wi11 soon vanish (p. 346). Science and Societal Issues The interdisciplinary nature of the societal problems was shown in the various articles presented, but in so far as possible, these have been grouped in three areas: Environmental, Energy, and Health- Related and Other Issues. Environmental In his article about the nature of science in the twenty-first century, Elliott (1976) made references to some of the science and societal issues that need consideration. He referred to propositions developed by Project Delphi and studied in terms of likelihood of 33 occurrence and educational impact. Some of these were: • The developed nations of the world will have reduced their per capita consumption of available world resources. • Worldwide efforts to reduce population growth and pollution will have been generally unsuccessful. • Shortages of various inputs (e.g • J energy, material resources) will appear, often with little advance notice. . . • The arms race will be continuing unabated. • There will be worldwide recognition of the dangers of population growth and pollution of the biosphere (p. 25). The outlook for science education as described by Project Delphi participants was that few students would study much science. This would result in a low level of scientific literacy and aggravate the "two culture" split noted by C. P. Snow according to Elliott (1976). He stated that "most science taken will focus on ecological problems. Students will become actively involved in community resource management, energy and population studies, and similar conservation-related programs" (p. 26). Schroeer (1972) described the two cultures of C. P. Snow, the scientific culture and the intellectual culture, but he felt the term humanistic culture should be used because scientists can also be intellectuals. He indicated that scientists see humanists as failures because they have not solved the world's basic problems. The humanists see some of the losses due to technological evolution as being very real. It is stated by Schroeer (1972), "The population 34 explosion leads to overcrowding so that there is no retreat from one's neighbor; the air stinks from technological pollution; the atom bomb is like the Sword of Damocles; the good things in life seem to be vanishing" (p. 8). Bromery (1978) stated that of all the issues confronting us, none was more crucial than the depletion of fossil fuels and other nonrenewable resources. He stated, "It will take more than scientific know-how to solve this problem; of paramount importance is a change in our attitudes and expectations" (p. 33). Berkheimer and McLeod (1979) discussed three topics some felt represented an important social problem that needed to be addressed by science educators. These were sex education, environmental education, and energy education, They stated that sex education was an obvious response to the rising incidence of veneral disease and pregnancy among adolescents. The need for environmental education was based on the realization that we must make our students sensitive to the dangers of pollution and environmental degradation. Energy education is the response to social changes being wrought by grow- ing scarcity of energy resources. Berkheimer and McLeod (1979) stated, "The topics should be vehicles by which to apply the content of science and other disciplines. We must not let any one problem area become the sole or even the primary vehicle for teaching science" (p. 39). In his address to the NSTA's Thirtieth National Convention, McCormack (1982) stated: 35 Students should seek . . . the best scientific information available to solve such important social issues as energy supply and conservation; the limited resources of land, water, minerals and fuel; pollution; population explosion; the threat of nuclear, biological, or chemical war (p. 9). Commoner (1966) said it could be argued that the hazards of modern pollutants are small compared to the dangers associated with other human enterprises. He felt that the hazard of fallout was much smaller than the risks we take on the highways or in the air. He said that no estimate of the actual harm done by fallout, smog, or chemical pollutants could obscure the realization that in each case, the risk was undertaken before it was fully understood. Some of the other issues discussed by Commoner in his book were deter¬ gents, insecticides, and DDT. Environmental issues discussed by Hardy (1975) were ecology, pollution and sources, thermal pollution, noise, solid waste, radio- activity, nuclear energy, and agression and the technology of environment. He stated: They are appalled at ugly strip mines, oil slicks from tanker spills and leaks, offshore wells, denuded corridors of land for energy transmission lines, sulfur oxides, and fly ash from power plants, noxious emissions from automobile exhausts, and the real or imaginary specter of radioactive perils from nuclear centers. Scientists and technologists are thus faced with a major problem: how to protect the environment and still provide the "good life" (p. 15). 36 Energy In his address to the 1975 NSTA Convention, Pauling used as his theme the scientists' obligation to improve human welfare. He addressed a number of science and societal issues. He felt that some alternative energy sources, such as solar radiation, winds and tides did not use up the resources of the earth. He stated, "I would like to see more exploitation of these energy sources, As for nuclear energy, I am opposed to nuclear power plants of the fission type . . . but fusion type might be acceptable" (p. 22). Fowler (1975) discussed many issues related to the energy problem. Some of these were: the categories of energy consumption, the end uses of energy, the sources of energy, and problems of energy supply (oil importation, natural gas, blackouts, and brown- outs). He indicated that supply and demand was in many ways the least troublesome part of the energy problem. A more troublesome dimension was the effects on our environment of increased energy consumption and production. The many areas discussed by Fowler as they related to the energy problem were: air pollution, sulfur smog, the automobile and air pollution, competition for water, land use, ocean use, nuclear energy, radioactive pollution, and hijacking and bombs. In regard to nuclear energy, Fowler (1975) stated: Nuclear energy may help solve some of our pollution problems, but it may give us new ones. It could relieve some of the air pollution problems presented by the fossil fuels. . . .All energy conversions pollute, we can take this as a law of nature and nuclear presents its own special hazards (p. 38). 37 Kranzberg (1975) also discussed energy as a societal issue. He started out by giving the physicists' definition of energy as the ability to do work. He pointed out that the physicists have formulated laws of thermodynamics relating different forms of energy to one another and to work performed, But to Kranzberg (1975), "energy is more than a physical phenomena. The way in which energy is produced, controlled, and applied—used and misused--helps determine the nature of society" (p. 10). He stated that much of the difficulty of the energy crisis arose from public hostility from fears of such things as thermal pollution and radiation hazards and alarm over danger to the environment from older forms of energy. Health-Related and Other Issues In addition to energy, many science and society issues were discussed in Wolke (Ed • > 1975). Some of these were recycling materials, air pollution, population and food supply, pesticides, the choices of life and death, genetic engineering, sterilizing those with hereditary diseases, human cloning, and dying with dignity. Keiffer (1975) stated that many of the issues need attack- ing immediately. He stated that in order to do this, "A formidable educational program will be needed for all students at all grade levels. We can start by inserting into the curriculum . . . the humanists' 3Rs—responsibility, realization of self, and relating to others" (p. 12). Carin and Sund (1980) presented a table of biologic content 38 and related social issue questions. Some of the items presented were: 1. Flow of matter and energy--Should solid refuse be disposed of in landfills? 2. Relationship of organisms to each other and to their environment--Should we continue the use of pesticides to control agricultural pests? 3. Population growth and regulation--Should the human race be considered too populous? 4. Succession—Should we continue the use of strip mining? 5. Cellular multiplication--Should drugs that cause chromosomal damage be allowed? 6. Synthesis of carbohydrates and proteins—Should food shortage be allowed to control the size of human population? 7. Mendelian laws—Should genetics be allowed to alter the genes of people? 8. Development—Should society retain all congenitally defective persons at home? 9. Animals: Classification and structure—Should we be aware of how we determine when we die? (p. 68). Examples of Programs Relating Science and Society Issues Fischer (1975) identified two gaps or deficiencies in the typical science courses. These were a lack of understanding of the basic nature of science and either a lack of comprehension or a 39 wrong comprehension of the relevancy of science to human beings in facing the issues of the times in which they lived. He discussed four approaches that have been used throughout the educational community to attempt to remedy the deficiencies. Fischer stated that one approach was for science educators to turn the problem over to the educators in other disciplines such as philosophy or hi story. The second approach was "to replace courses in science with courses about science" (p. iv). Fischer felt this approach resulted in minimizing one deficiency by accentuating another one. He stated, "To emphasize either substance or relevance and to neglect the other is an approach which is incomplete, unbalanced, and misleading" (p. v). Fischer's third approach was to reorganize the courses around such themes as pollution, population or public health. He felt this approach was both unstable and uncomprehensive. The fourth approach of Fischer (1975) was "to supplement the subject- matter content of a science course with additional material concern- ing the basic nature of science and its relevance to man and society" (p. vi). This approach was used by Fischer in his book. Environmental The editors of Today's Education (1980) asked science teachers to give readers some ideas on dealing with controversial issues in the science classroom. The teachers found the environment the most controversial topic in their classroom. Borkey (1981) described a two-semester biology course offered in a Virginia high school in 40 which students study the basic ecological factors that control and define the three major ecosystems. Students are given problems to solve using the laws and principles that govern each ecosystem's ability to support life. Then they must apply what they have learned to actual situations. Borkey observed that this application of material seemed to be unusual at the high school level and led to real classroom controversy as well as community involvement and input. One application was given. When terrestrial ecology is taught, land-use planning is taught with it. Students discuss how to plan land topography, and location; the legality of zonings; county development plans; human needs. Students are encouraged to look at magazines to see the advertisements concerning land use. Borkey (1981) stated, "Applying scientific attitude to practical issues can be controversial itself" (p. 39). Dillingham (1981) described a high school course called Environ- ment and Energy Studies. It was taught by a team from the science department and the social studies department. Dillingham stated, "The reason environmentalism is controversial may be that it is based on facts that people want to ignore" (p. 41). In order to ensure classroom discussion remains rational no matter how contro- versial the issue, Dillingham made suggestions to try to fit the individual issues into a global and historical context, strive to be honest by being certain of the facts and stick to them rather than opinion, and recognize that bias cannot be totally eradicated. 41 Energy Carin and Sund (1980) stated that the science studies selected should relate as much as possible to the everyday life and activities of the students. They named one topic for selection as energy education and referred to David Kuhn's article, "Teaching the Energy Lesson." In the article written by Kuhn (1978), four elements that should characterize any energy education program were given: 1. Energy education should be interdisciplinary. It should branch into every area of curriculum. . . . 2. Energy education should relate to the everyday life of children. Concepts such as insulators and conductors take on much more meaning when related to the problems of insulating a school or home. More broadly, you can look at the social implications of tax hikes and guzzling autos. 3. Energy education should consider attitudes, values, and decision making. There are five basic levels in energy education: Acti on t Decision making A Attitudes and values f Concepts t Information Values-clarification techniques, (Carin & Sund, 1980, p. 66; Kuhn, 1978, p. 32) . . . are promising avenues for 42 exploring attitudes and value systems. . . .Simulation exercises . . . sensitize students to the views of competing interests and prepare them for social decision making. . . . Advertising is another area that can shed light on how we form attitudes and values in the first place. . . . 4. Energy education should be future oriented and stress alternatives. Help your students to see that many futures are possible and decisions made now will affect both their lives and those of generations to come. . . .Encourage full discussion of all the facets of energy-related issues, such as nuclear energy and possible government rationing of fuel (Carin & Sund, 1980, p. 66; Kuhn, 1978, p. 33). Kuhn (1978) stated, "Energy education is challenging, It combines study of the past, present, and future by building upon (not diluting) fundamental scientific information and concepts, It is, at once, a concern and an opportunity" (p. 33). Lenda and Learn (1980) described a project called the Pennsylvania Nuclear Science Project and the steps taken to determine whether or not the project had any significant carry-over. The stated purpose of the project was "to introduce an elective course in nuclear science to Pennsylvania high schools by upgrading the subject-matter competence of interested teachers" (p. 27). All of the high schools in Pennsylvania were invited to participate. Twenty schools were selected from those that applied for the first institute. The units developed for the program were as follows: 43 I. Introduction: Atomic Energy II. Atomic Particles and Electromagnetic Radiations III. The Dualistic Nature of Radiant Energy IV. The Structure of the Atom V. Radioactivity VI. Particle Accelerators VII. Nuclear Fission VIII. Nuclear Fusion IX. Radiation: Health Physics X. Radioisotope Applications (Lenda and Learn, 1980, p. 28). Dever and Horsch (1981) described a program developed in Wyoming called Energy and Us as a multidisciplinary program in which students' interest dictates the focus each year within the general subject of energy production, conversion, and consumption. Some of the topics explored have been air and water quality, land use and reclamation, energy reserves, alternative sources of energy, personal energy use and conservation practices, and the social and economic impact of energy development. The course is taught by a team from the science department and the social studies department. The resources of the community are used extensively, The course deals with the local issues so conflicting values in the community usually surface. The proper role of students in public issues is considered a more subtle area of conflict. The writers considered controversy an integral and useful dimension of science education. Crater and Mears (1981) described their efforts to improve and 44 teach an eighth-grade unit on energy and to measure the resultant student learning. This took place in Verona, Mississippi. They used some of the nineteen "Fact Sheets on Alternate Energy Technol- ogies" available from the Department of Energy (DOE), four energy- related 16mm films, and interdisciplinary energy activity packets developed for DOE by NSTA. They stated the following: One entitled "Transportation and the City" was designed for eighth and ninth graders. This was chosen as the primary source of activities and unifying theme for the energy unit presented to earth-science students in Verona in the spring 1979. Two of the most effective activities included student interviews with older people (grandparents, neighbors, etc.) about the types and sources of energy used 40-50 years ago and a mock trial based on the charge, "The automobile has done permanent injury to humanity." Other activities used in the unit included building solar collectors, drawing energy conservation measures, collecting current news articles to share with the class, becoming familiar with the Celsius temperature scale, reading home electric meters and classifying household appliances according to energy con¬ sumption. This emphasis on an activity-oriented unit contrasted markedly with the conventional textbook approach used in previous years (p. 122). In order to assess the outcomes of the unit, they selected items from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Report 45 to help develop two instruments. Crater and Mears, (1981) stated, Twenty-four statements of opinion were compiled to which the students were asked to respond by circling "agree," "disagree," "neutral," or "undecided" on an answer sheet. The second instrument consisted of twenty multiple-choice questions about energy knowledge that were based on items used by NAEP. A total of 88 Verona eighth graders responsded to both questionnaires after completing the unit (p. 22). A control group of 42 eighth graders in an adjacent community answered the same questionnaires. A primary difference between the two groups was that the control group had not had a unit on energy. The Verona students achieved higher average scores on the Knowledge of Energy test than the control group. However, the test items were not chosen to reflect information presented to the students in the energy unit, but to correspond to specific ideas covered on the NAEP instrument. After the unit, more of the eighth graders at Verona (94% vs. 80% for the control group) agreed with this statement: "Energy shortages pose a serious threat to the people of the United States" (p. 123). Health Related and Other Issues In the preface to his book, Clark (1973) indicated that by applying scientific principles, man developed a technology that affected himself both directly and indirectly in ways that were unforeseen—explosive population growth, drug abuse, and environ- mental deterioration. As a result, society must be willing 46 to redirect itself by attempting to understand the nature of the problem. Clark felt this made biology a relevant course for all mankind. In describing this book, Clark said: This book attempts to present the subject matter of biology in a way which relates to every individual. . . . Those areas of information which are most important for an understanding of current biological problems have been emphasized. As each new topic (p. v) is introduced, it is followed by a chapter which applies the principles just learned to some specific contemporary problem (p. vi). Two examples are Chapter 15 entitled, "Genetics, The Study of Inheritance" followed by Chapter 15a, "Mutation, Radiation Damage and Genetic Risk" and Chapter 22, "Human Reproduction" and Chapter 22a, "Birth Control." Aikenhead (1979) described a course Science: A Way of Knowing as being designed to provide a model to most of the needs to the adolescent in the last quarter of the twentieth century. It was developed by Aikenhead and Reg W. Fleming. It was field tested by ten teachers in Sasketchewan and by Aikenhead in Switzerland. Aikenhead stated as the primary aim of the course to develop the inquiry skills and knowledge which will allow students to make sense out of their rapidly changing society. Because science and technology are agents of major change in our society students should understand the functions and limitations of these agents (p. 23). 47 The principle goals of the course were stated as follows: 1. To have students develop a realistic, nonmystical under- standing of the nature, process, and social aspects of science; 2. To have students develop a variety of inquiry skills and a realistic feeling of personal competence in the areas of interpreting, responding to, and evaluating their scientific, and technological society; 3. To have students develop insight into the interaction of science and technology; and, in turn, into the interaction of these with other aspects of society (politics, economics, and the humanities, for instance) (Aikenhead, 1979, p. 23). Nalence (1980) described a program called Engineering Concepts Curriculum Project (ECCP) as a vigorous and heavily funded effort to introduce a year-long "science-society" course into the high school curriculum. The program was begun in 1965. A text, The Man-Hade World, was produced as well as equipment and supporting materials. Willett and Roy (1982) described a special program designed to examine the relationship between science and the humanities. Starting in the spring of 1981, the course was offered as an elective by the English Department of Westfield High School, Westfield, New Jersey to a selected group of seniors. The course was entitled, Two Cultures: Fact, Fantasy, or Fiction. The unit was based on the ideas of C. P. Snow's Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution and John Mersey's The Triumph of Numbers, which was a review of Snow's concerns. 48 Several major questions emerged through a variety of class activities including films, research, readings, values clarification exercises, invited speakers, and discussion. To conclude the unit, students were asked to solve the hypothetical problem stated by Willett and Roy (1982) as: Because of the declining enrollments and financial restrictions, the academic program at the high school will be reduced to basic courses in science and humanities. . . .Two possible sources could provide the school district with the necessary funds to enrich the curriculum, but the community cannot obtain both financial grants; the choice must be made between a grant available from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and another from the National Science Foundation (NSF) (p. 35). Students are divided into two groups, scientists and humanists, and are to use the knowledge gained in their studies during the unit to outline a curriculum financed by either of the specified organizations. Each group will then try to persuade the board of education to accept their plan. According to Willett and Roy (1982): This special curricula unit at Westfield High School has had a "domino effect", encouraging others to examine the relation- ship between science and the humanities. Individual teachers have recently begun to assess their classroom activities. . . The goal is to produce a well-educated student. Such adjust- ments and experiments in the curriculum, generate new study 49 units, interdisciplinary in scope, that will contribute to greater unity in the educational process. Parents, members of the community, and the board of education are acutely aware of the need for acknowledging science as a basic skill, for creating programs that will lead to scientific literacy, and for providing the financial means to achieve these goals (p. 35). Another program described was a nine-week mi ni course on ecology that was part of an advanced science program at the eleventh grade. It was described by Conner (1975) as a debate program in Ohio. Riban (1977) described a program at West Leyden High School in Northlake, Illinois whose premise was that the most valuable student experience in science outside school comes from a direct scientific attack on some legitimate problem. Some problems studied have been the rate of sedimentation of a nearby lake, water pollution, and pulp mill effluents. It is apparent in this review of the literature that many educators see a need to relate actual science instruction to societal concerns. This study attempted to develop curriculum modules that would address one of the major science-society issues: energy. CHAPTER III DESIGN OF THE STUDY This study was concerned with the development and implemen- tation of teaching modules relating specific physical science knowledge and concepts to the energy and society issues to improve student attitudes toward and knowledge of energy thus enabling the student to become more scientifically literate. The study, conducted during the academic year of 1982-83, involved a total of 50 students enrolled in two physical science classes at Bear Grass School. The study was made possible through the cooperation of Mr. Dennis Mills, principal at Bear Grass School and the members of the study investigator's thesis committee and director at East Carolina University. The Tested Hypotheses A null hypothesis is generally considered the best type of hypothesis to employ in statistical studies. The null hypothesis is defined by Batten (1972) as "a method used to test the signifi- canee of differences. The hypothesis asserts that there is no true difference between the means of two distributions of scores, and that the difference found between sample means (if one) is accidental and unimportant" (p. 86). This study analyzes the following null hypotheses: 1. There is no significant difference in the attitudes of 51 physical science students concerning energy and society issues after exposure to study investigator developed modules, as measured by the Energy Attitude Instrument. 2. There is no statistically significant difference in the performance of physical science students on energy knowledge instruments after exposure to study investigator developed modules, as measured by three Energy Knowledge Instruments. Duration of the Study This study was initiated in February, 1983 and terminated in May, 1983. Students were pre-tested in February, 1983 for their attitudes toward energy and society issues. Students were post- tested in May, 1983 using the same measures. They were pre-tested for energy knowledge before each of the three Energy Education Modules were implemented and post-tested afterward using the same measures. The Study Group The study group consisted of 50 students who were enrolled in two physical science classes taught by the study investigator during the 1982-83 academic year at Bear Grass School. Twenty- six of the students were females and the remaining twenty-four were males. One physical science class was identified as low ability and the other as medium to high ability. 52 Description of the Treatment A. Treatment Objectives 1. The students will be exposed to energy and society issues that are relevant to them and affect them and their daily lives more than the structured text materials. 2. The students will experience an alternative to the ordinary classroom routine as they participate in "hands-on" activities designed to reinforce and extend classroom exposure to energy and society issues. 3. The students will participate in group investigations and role-playing situations designed to allow them to make energy-related value decisions. 4. The students will be exposed to audio-visual materials and games to supplement classroom discussion and acti vi ties. B. Treatment The Energy Attitude Instrument was given as a pre-test at the beginning of the study. Students were then given a knowledge pre-test on Module I, What is Energy? Module I What is Energy? The main purpose of the first module was to ensure an in- depth understanding of energy the students could relate to the next two modules. Students were exposed to two introductory activities, 53 "Forms of Energy Used in Everyday Life" and "The Pendulum." These were to provide them with factual information concerning the definition of energy and the idea that man and nature use energy by changing it from one form to another. Next, there were four developmental activities, "Measuring Work In Picking Up Books;" "Measuring Work Done Moving Masses With and Without Wheels;" "Energy Interconversion In A Spring;" and "Calculating Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy." In these activities, students related energy transfer and work and were exposed to units for expressing force, distance, and work, and thus energy. There were two concluding activities to help students relate the concepts (energy, work, power) developed in the module. These were "Horsepower" and "Energy and Power Units Game." Students took the knowledge post-test on Module I and the knowledge pre-test on Module II. Module II Sources of Energy The three introductory activities for Module II were "Finish the Energy Timeline," "Primary Energy Sources" and "Where We Get Our Energy and How We Use It." These activities were designed to introduce the students to the primary energy sources and the four sectors of energy users in society (transportation, industrial, commercial, residential). The developmental activities students participated in to help them relate the energy sources to the social issues were: 1. "Fossil Fuels: Coal, Oil and Natural Gas" 54 2. "Petroleum and The Way You Live" 3. "Nuclear Energy" a. "Nuclear Power Plants" b. "Mass Into Energy" (Film) c. "Radiation . . . Naturally" (Film) (1) "Activity One: Just the Facts" (2) "Activity Two: How Do You Measure Up" (3) "Activity Three: Radiation In History" d. Nuclear Waste Isolation: A Progress Report" (Film) e. "Nuclear Power Safety" f. "The Fall-Out Shelter Problem" 4. "Alternate Energy Sources" a. "Solar Energy" b. "Other New Energy Sources" There were two concluding activities, "The Oil We Import" and "Problems/Solutions" to help students understand that our energy needs may be ultimately filled not by a single source, but by a practical combination of many. After these two activities, students were post-tested on Module II and pre-tested on Module III. Module III Energy Consumption and Conservation Energy consumption varies with factors such as economy, life-style, philosophy, and custom. Our past energy supply and consumption has contributed to the present energy problems. Students need to understand how this has happened in order to approach the 55 energy challenge of the future with greater respect. This was accomplished through Module III. To increase the students' awareness of energy use in their own daily lives and to build an awareness of the changing energy usage of people in the United States, students participated in the two introductory activities, "Role of Energy Use" and "Allocation of Energy." The developmental activities exposed the students to the social problems associated with energy consumption and conservation. They were titled as follows: 1. "U. S. Energy Reserves and Consumption" 2. "Fuel and Energy Consumption" 3. "What Can You Do To Save Energy?" a. "Energy Conservation With Insulation" b. "The Best Insulating Material" 4. "It's Everyone's Job" 5. "Reading Electric Meters" 6. "Cost of Electricity" 7. "Understanding Your Electric Bill" 8. "Peak Load Use of Electrical Energy" 9. "Excessive Use of Automobiles" 10. "A Delicate Balance" 11. "What Are The Sources of Air Pollution?" 12. "What Is The Danger of Air Pollution?" 56 13. "How Much Water Is Used In The United States?" 14. "What Is In Polluted Water?" 15. "Do Phosphates and Water Mix?" 16. "How Much Waste Do We Produce Each Year?" 17. "Thermal Pollution" 18. "Energy-Related Value Decisions" 19. "Energy Management, Research and Development" 20. "Energy Supply and Demand: Shortages and Surplus" There were three concluding activities for Module III: "The Energy Chain," "Hidden Word Review," and "Energy Bingo." The purpose of these was to help students relate the more general information in the earlier activities to personal experiences. Students were post-tested on Module III and the Energy Attitude Instrument was given again. A list of enrichment and research activities was included with each module but for purposes of this study, these were not utilized. It was felt these would affect students* attitudes and achievement in ways that could not be accounted for, but they would be valuable to physical science teachers who might utilize the modules. (See Appendix B for a complete description, content, and bibliography of the three teaching modules.) Collection of the Data The data used in this study were collected on OPSCAN sheets 57 as students were pre- and post-tested on their attitudes toward energy and society issues and on their knowledge of energy and society issues. Instruments used were the Energy Attitude Instrument and the three Energy Knowledge Instruments. Measurement of Study Progress Growth in the students' attitude toward energy and society issues and increased knowledge of energy and society issues were two goals of science teaching to increase scientific literacy. Therefore, measures of change in attitude toward energy and society issues and of change in increased knowledge and society issues were collected from the students participating in this study. Attitude Toward Energy The test used to measure the variable of attitude toward energy and society issues was the Energy Attitude Instrument developed by the study investigator (see Appendix A). Fifty-six percent of the items used were taken by permission from a survey entitled Energy and Society: Evaluation of Attitudes constructed by Dr. Robert L. Dough (1978) of the Science Education Department of East Carolina. The instrument was reviewed by the study investigator's thesis committee and was deemed valid as a means of determining students attitudes toward energy and society issues and as a means of deter- mining changes in attitude after exposure to the three Energy Modules. The test used in this study was a 25-item Likert-type scale 58 consisting of 25 statements that are reacted to either positively or negatively. Students are asked to indicate their feelings toward energy and society issues in one of five ways: (a) strongly agree; (b) agree, (c) uncertain; (d) disagree; or (e) strongly disagree. The test was administered in February, 1983 and again in May, 1983. Energy Knowledge The instruments used to measure the variable of knowledge of energy and society issues were three Energy Knowledge Instruments developed by the study investigator (see Appendix A). Thirty-six percent of the items were taken by permission from a survey entitled Energy and Society: Evaluation of Knowledge constructed by Dr. Robert L. Dough (1978). Seven of the items of the Energy Know!- edge Instrument for Module III were taken from a Water Pollution Pre-post Test developed by Project Concern (1977). These tests were constructed to measure the extent to which the stated educa- tional objectives of the modules have been attained by the students in the two physical science classes. The objectives of these tests included the cognitive categories of knowledge, comprehensive, and application as well as the affective domain. Included in each of the tests are 25 items having four responses. The items relate to material covered in the activities of the modules. Each test was reviewed by the thesis committee and deemed valid as a means of determining the students' prior knowledge of energy and 59 society issues included in the three Energy Modules and as a means of determining change in physical science achievement as a result of exposure to the three teaching modules. Reliability coefficients for the three tests were computed as the data were analyzed. The coefficients were 0.67, 0.62, and 0.59 for Energy Knowledge Instru- ments I, II, and III respectively (see Table I). The tests were administered as follows: (a) pre-test Module I, February 11, 1983; (b) post-test Module I, February 25, 1983; (c) pre-test Module II, February 28, 1983; (d) post-test Module II, March 25, 1983; (e) pre-test Module III, March 28, 1983; and (f) post-test Module III, May 11, 1983. Procedure for Analysis of Data Student data for the Energy Attitude Instrument and the three Energy Knowledge Instruments were analyzed partially by computer and partially by hand (see Appendix A). t-test A t-test was used as a test of significance between the means of the pre-test and post-test scores for the study group. It is significant if the value obtained is greater than the table value for the corresponding degrees of freedom at the desired level of significance. The table for determining the level of significance of t-values in this study was given in Table D of Guilford and Fruchter's text (1978, p. 514). A t-test was used to determine if there were any significant 60 Table 1 Reliability of Tests as Computed by the Kuder-Richardson Formula Module Reí iabi1ity I 0.67 II 0.62 III 0.59 61 differences in the measureable knowledge of energy and society issues after exposure to the three Energy Modules. A percentage change comparison of the pre- and post-test responses was used to determine if there were differences in the energy attitudes of physical science students after exposure to the three Energy Modules. CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS OF THE DATA In order to analyze the effectiveness of the treatment exposure in this study, statements of the problem under investigation were presented in the form of null hypotheses. The study investigator was directed in the collection of data appropriate to the prob- lems by the statement of these hypotheses. There are two hypotheses in the study. These are discussed and summarized in this chapter. Hypothesis Concerning the Attitude Toward Energy and Society Issues of Physical Science Students Items from the Energy Attitude Instrument were administered prior to and upon completion of the testing period. It was used to test for differences in student attitudes toward energy and society issues. Hypothesis 1 There is no significant difference in the attitudes of physical science students concerning energy and society issues after exposure to study investigator developed modules, as measured by the Energy Attitude Instrument. A percentage change comparison of the pre-test and post-test responses was conducted to test this hypothesis (see Appendix A, Tables 5 and 6). In order to analyze the data the responses to each of the 25 items have been listed in Table 2 in three categories: 63 a and b (strongly agree-disagree); c (uncertain); and d and e (disagree-strongly disagree). An analysis of each item is as follows : 1. After the three Energy Modules were taught, the percentage of students who agreed that the use and development of energy is one of today's most crucial issues rose from 84% to 94%. 2. The percentage of students who felt present energy problems could lead to a decrease in the standard of living in the United States increased from 62% to 64%. 3. On the pre-test, almost half (48%) of the students agreed that most other major countries of the world have severe energy problems at the present time. The percentage remained the same on the post-test. 4. More students seemed to be uncertain concerning the statement that scientists and engineers will probably solve most of the energy problems of the United States in the next 10-15 years. The percentage rose from 40% to 46%. 5. A rise in the percentage from 8% to 20% showed that a greater percentage of students agreed that the United States should do everything possible to become independent of foreign supplies of oil even if this means heating oil and gasoline will cost significantly more. 6. The total of those who agreed citizens can influence the 64 87..TThhFeeedrreeeral government in energy issues remained the same;however, there was a noticeable difference in the degree9.Thoef raegreement demonstrated in the "strongly agree1 and"agree" responses. On the pre-test, there were 4% whostrongly agreed and 56% who agreed (see Table 2).was an increase from 36% to 50% in the percentageof students who felt that if we would better conserveour fossil fuel resources there would be enough energyto last indefinitely.was a percentage rise from 56% to 78% in those whoagreed that the production and use of energy in theUnited States is a threat to the quality of our air andwater.Questions 9-13 were designed to reflect students' attitudestoward five kinds of large scale power plants (to generateelectricity) being built within 25 miles of their homes.was a rise in the percentage from 74% to 78% of those who felt the construction of a windmill power plant would not bother them. 10. More agreed that a solar power plant would not bother them as shown by the percentage rise from 56% to 70%. 11. The percentage who felt a nuclear power plant would not bother them increased from 6% to 12%. The percentage who disagreed with the statement remained about the 65 Table 2 Energy Attitude Instrument Pre and Post Percentage Responses Pre Post Change Item a and bed and e a and bed and e a and bed and e 1 84 10 6 94 0 6 +10 -10 0 2 62 20 18 64 24 12 +2 +4 -6 3 48 42 10 48 42 8 0 0-2 4 18 40 42 18 46 36 0 +6 -6 5 26 8 66 34 20 44 +8 +12 -22 6 60 22 18 60 18 20 0 -4 +2 7 36 42 22 50 20 26 + 14 -22 +4 8 56 28 16 78 12 10 +22 -16 -6 9 74 8 18 78 14 8 +4 +6 -10 10 56 12 32 70 14 16 +14 +2 -16 11 6 14 80 12 10 78 +6 -4 -2 12 22 16 62 12 22 66 -10 +6 +4 13 34 24 42 40 30 30 +6 +6 -12 14 54 34 12 64 22 14 +10 -12 +2 15 56 34 10 52 18 30 -4 -16 +20 16 36 24 40 22 14 64 -14 _io +24 17 38 32 30 26 32 42 -12 0 +12 18 12 28 60 28 10 60 +16 +8 0 19 72 20 8 68 22 10 -4 +2 +2 20 22 10 68 12 16 70 -10 +6 +2 21 48 30 22 46 20 34 -2 -10 +12 22 54 26 20 66 22 12 +12 -4 -8 23 52 28 20 68 20 12 +16 -8 -8 24 32 16 52 50 14 36 +18 -2 -16 25 68 18 12 74 10 10 +6 -8 -2 Key: a = strongly agree d = disagree b = agree e = strongly disagree c = uncertain 66 same (80% on the pre-test and 78% on the post-test). 12. There was a decrease in percentage from 22% to 12% for the students who agreed that a coal power plant would not bother them. The percentage of "uncertain responses increased from 16% to 22%. 13. More students, as shown by a percentage rise from 34% to 40%, responded that the construction of a hydroelectric dam would not both them. 14. The percentage of students who agreed that the total energy production around the world will have to increase greatly in order for other countries to significantly increase their standard of living rose from 54% to 64%. 15. A percentage rise from 10% to 30% indicated that more students disagreed with the statement that there are enough fossil fuels for all countries of the world if we would better manage our energy resources. 16. Students also disagreed, as shown by a percentage rise from 40% to 64%, that there are only a few ways by which energy can be significantly conserved in the United States; we are doing all we can. 17. The percentage of students who disagreed with the idea that an energy crisis existed being created by the government and oil companies in order for the oil companies to raise the prices of oil rose from 30% to 42%. 67 18. There was a 16% rise in the percentage (12% to 28%) of students who agreed there is no real problem in importing most of our oil. 19. There was a slight drop in the percentage (72% to 68%) of those that agreed that in a sense, conservation is an energy source. 20. The percentage of students who agreed that producing enough energy to meet our needs is far more important than protecting the environment dropped from 22% to 12%. 21. A rise in percentage from 22% to 24% showed more disagreed that increasing nuclear power is a good way to meet future energy needs. 22. There was a rise in percentage from 54% to 66% for those who agreed that spending tax dollars to develop ways to use wind energy to produce electricity is a wise investment. 23. There was a percentage rise from 52% to 68% for those who felt more tax dollars should be spent to develop ways to convert solar energy into heat and electricity. 24. The percentage of students who agreed that the production of large cars should be banned in the United States to help conserve fuel rose from 32% to 50%. 25. There was a percentage rise from 68% to 74% for those 68 who agreed that they wanted to learn more about energy problems and energy conservation. The changes in attitudes on virtually all of the scales reflect changes in the beliefs students had about energy before and after instruction. The measured attitudes reflect greater insight into and awareness of energy and society issues. There- fore, based on the changes in the pre-test and post-test responses on the Energy Attitude Instrument, the hypotheses was rejected. Hypothesis Concerning Performance of Physical Science Students on Energy Knowledge Instruments The same 50 students also took each of the three Energy Knowledge Instruments prior to and at the conclusion of the particular module for which the instrument was designed. The Energy Knowledge Instruments were used to test for differences in the performance of physical science students before and after exposure to the three Energy Modules relating energy and society issues. The pre-test and post-test scores for each of the three modules are summarized in Tables 7, 8 and 9 of Appendix A. Hypothesis 2 There is no statistically significant difference in the performance of physical science students on energy knowledge instruments after exposure to study investigator developed modules as measured by the three Energy Knowledge Instruments. 69 Table 3 Energy Knowledge Instruments Summary of Means Mean Module Pre-Test Post-Test Difference I 9.46 14.04 4.58 II 12.84 14.34 1.50 III 13.10 15.78 2.68 70 The mean difference between the pre-test and post-test scores for Module I was 4.58 (see Table 3). The difference between the pre-test and post-test means for Module II was 1.50 and for Module III the mean difference was 2.68 (see Table 3). A t-test was conducted for each Energy Knowledge Instrument to test this hypothesis. The formula used was appropriate for small groups with unequal N's (Guilford & Fruchter, 1978, p. 157): X1 " X2 t 2 2 X1 - X2 N, + N1 2 N1 - N2 - 2 N,N12 The pre-test and post-test mean difference for each of the three knowledge instruments was analyzed through the use of the t-test. A summary of the analyses is included in Table 4. A t-test value of 3.33 for Module I was significant at the .01 level. The t-value of 2.11 for Module II was significant at the .05 level. For Module III, the t-value of 3.06 was significant at the .01 level. Based upon this evidence, the null hypothesis was rejected. Specific data analyses are shown in Table 10 of Appendix A. 71 Table 4 t-Test Analysis of the Energy Knowledge Instruments Calculated Table t-Value Table t-Value Data Analyzed t-Value .05 Level .01 Level 1. Module I Pre-test 3.33 1.96 2.58 and Post-test Differences 2. Module II Pre-test 2.11 1.96 2.58 and Post-test Differences 3. Module III Pre-test 3.06 1.96 2.58 and Post-test Differences 72 Summary of Hypotheses Hypothesis Analysis Results 1. There is no significant Percentage Comparison Rejected difference in the attitudes of physical science students concerning energy and society issues after exposure to study investigator developed modules, as measured by the Energy Attitude Instrument. 2. There is no statistically t-test Rejected significant difference in the performance of physical science students on energy knowledge instruments after exposure to study investigator developed modules, as measured by three Energy Knowledge Instruments. CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Introduction One of the continuing concerns of science education has been and is that science educators need to do more to relate science and society issues in order "to develop scientifically literate individuals who understand how science, technology, and society influence one another and who are able to use this knowledge in their everyday decision making" (Science-Technology-Society: Science Education For The 1980s. An NSTA Position Statement, 1982, p. 2) This study attempted to develop and implement modules that relate specific physical science knowledge and concepts of energy to the science-society literature. This study attempted to answer the following questions: 1. Does the introduction of a series of specialized activities into the classroom significantly improve the students' attitudes toward energy and society issues? 2. Does the introduction of a series of specialized activities into the classroom significantly improve the achievement of students on energy and society issues? This study was concerned with answering these questions as they related to 50 students enrolled in physical science during the 1982-83 academic year at Bear Grass School. The procedures followed in this study were (a) reviewing the 74 literature related to science and society issues, (b) developing a series of specialized activities and instruments to be used in the classroom, (c) designing the study, and (d) analyzing the data obtained from the design. The significant findings are presented in this chapter. Summary Literature Review The major problem areas discussed in the literature were (a) the need for a systematic understanding of science, (b) the elements of science, (c) the objectives of science instruction, (d) the general goals of education, (e) the general goals of science education, (f) the need to develop scientifically literate individuals, (g) values in science teaching, (h) the need for an interdisciplinary curriculum, (i) science and societal issues, (j) the examples of programs relating science and society issues, and (d) the difficulty of introducing science-society materials. Design of the Study From this review, a series of specialized activities was developed and implemented in two physical science classes. The techniques used were: 1. activity sheets designed to expose the students to energy and society issues relevant to their daily lives, such as energy reserves, alternate sources of energy, personal 75 energy use and conservation, social and economic impact of energy development, land disruption, air and water quality, and radiation hazard; 2. "hands-on" activities designed to reinforce and extend classroom exposure to the energy and society issues; 3. group investigations and role-playing situations designed to allow students to make energy-related value decisions; 4. use of audio-visual materials and games to supplement classroom discussion and activities. This study involved 50 students enrolled in two classes of physical science at Bear Grass School. All students were administered tests for measuring their attitude toward energy and society issues in February, 1983 and again in May, 1983, in order to measure the degree of improvement in their attitudes. All students were administered tests for measuring their knowledge of energy and society issues for a particular module before and again after exposure to the module, between February, 1983 and May, 1983 in order to measure the degree of improvement in their achievement. The tests administered were: Energy Attitude Instrument Energy Knowledge Instrument Module I Energy Knowledge Instrument Module II Energy Knowledge Instrument Module III 76 Analysis of the Data The percentage change comparison was employed in order to determine if any significant differences in attitudes toward energy and society issues could be detected before and after exposure to the three Energy Modules, as measured by the Energy Attitude Instrument. The t-test of significance was employed in order to determine if any significant differences in achievement on energy and society issues could be detected before and after exposure to the three Energy Modules, as measured by the three Energy Knowledge Instruments. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that the incorporation of specialized activities into the regular classroom can successfully increase favorable attitudes toward energy and society issues among physical science students as illustrated by the significant changes between the pre-test and post-test results. The changes were measured by the Energy Attitude Instrument developed by the study investigator. The results further indicate that the incorporation of specialized activities into the regular classroom can successfully increase the achievement on energy and society issues as illustrated by the significant changes between the pre-test and post-test mean differences for each of the three Energy Knowledge Instruments. 77 Implications The investigator anticipates that the results of this study are applicable to all areas of science education. Generally, the study indicates that specialized activities designed to improve students' attitudes toward, and knowledge of, energy and society issues can be incorporated as a part of the instruction in the science classroom. Specifically, the study implies the following: 1. It is feasible to teach and to develop favorable attitudes toward energy and society issues among physical science students. 2. Instruments may be developed to measure attitudes. 3. Attitude improvement is more likely with directed instruction than if it is left as a assumed result of a student merely being enrolled in a physical science course. 4. It is feasible to teach to increase achievement on energy and society issues. 5. Instruments may be developed to measure achievement of energy and society issues. 6. Increased achievement is more likely with specialized activities than if it is left as an assumed result of a student merely being enrolled in a "regular" physical science course. 78 7. All science educators need to become involved in teaching science and society issues in order that students will become more scientifically literate. 8. More research effort and instructional development needs to be pursued in the area of teaching science and society issues in order to ensure students will become more scientifically literate. The study investigator sees an ever-increasing need by science educators to correlate efforts to relate science and society issues so that students will better understand how science, technology, and society influence one another and how they will be able to use this knowledge in their everyday lives. BIBLIOGRAPHY Aikenhead, G. C. Science: A way of knowing. The Science Teacher, September, 1979, 46: 6, 23-25. Andersen, H. 0. The holistic approach to science education. The Science Teacher, January, 1978, 45: 1, 27-28. Anderson, N. D. and Brown, W. R. Physical science a search for understanding teachers1 annotated edition. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1977. Asimov, I. Convention '78 revisited. (Address given at NSTA's 26th Annual National Convention in Washington, D. C.). The Science Teacher, May, 1978, 45: 5, 27-34. Barber, B. Science and the social order. New York: The Free Press, 1952. Batten, J. W. Understanding research (2nd ed.). Greenville, N. C.: Education Publications, 1972. Berkheimer, G. D. and McLeod, P. J. Searching for meaning in science education. The Science Teacher, April, 1979, 40: 4, 38-39. Birnie, H. H. Identifying affective goals in science education. The Science Teacher, December, 1978, 45: 9, 29-33. Blumenfeld, F. A. A plea for freedom in science teaching. The Science Teacher, September, 1976, 43: 6, 17-18. Borkey, P. D. Examining all sides. Today's Education, November- December, 1981, 70: 4, 38-40. Boulding, K. E. The scientific revelation. In R. Wolke (Ed.), Impact: Science on society. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975. Bromery, R. W. Convention '78 revisited. (Address given at NSTA's 26th Annual National Convention in Washington, D. C.). The Science Teacher, May, 1978, 45.: 5, 27-34. Carin, A. A. and Sund, R. B. Teaching science through discovery (4th Ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, 1980. 80 Clark, M. E. Contemporary biology concepts and implications, Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1973. Commoner, B. Science and survival. New York: The Vikinq Press, 1966. Conner, P. E. Debate as a way to teach environmental issues. The Science Teacher, January, 1975, 4£: 1 , 49-50. Crater, H. L. and Mears, D. E. Evaluating attitudes toward, and knowledge of energy problems in the eighth grade, School Science and Mathematics, February, 1981, 81_: 2, 121-123. Dever, R. and Horsch, E. Controversial conversation from objec- tivity to action. Today's Education, November-December, 1981, 70: 4, 34-36. Dillingham, C. K. Presenting the issues. Today's Education, November-December, 1981, 70: 4-41. Elliott, W. Science teaching in the 21st century. The Science Teacher, January, 1976, 43: 1, 24-26. Energy and society. Evaluation of attitudes. Developed by Dr. Robert L. Dough, Department of Science Education, ECU, c. 1978. Energy and society. Evaluation of knowledge. Developed by Dr. Robert L. Dough, Department of Science Education, ECU, c. 1978. Evans, T. P. Dividing the future of our discipline. The Science Teacher, December, 1977, 44: 9, 28-30. Fischer, R. B. Science, man and society. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975. Fowler, J. M. Entering a new age. The Science Teacher, October, 1975, 42: 8, 32-38. Gardner, M. Ten trends in science education. The Science Teacher, January, 1979, 46_: 1 , 30-32. Guilford, J. P. and Fruchter, B. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc • 9 1978. Hardy, J. T. Science, technology, and the environment. Phi lade 1 phi a: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975. 81 Heimler, C. H. and Price, J. Focus on physical science, Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, 1977. Herron, J. D. Implicit curriculum—where values are really taught. The Science Teacher, March, 1977, 44: 3, 30-31. Hounshell, P. B. and Coble, C. R. Science is basic. North Carolina Education, January, 1979, 9: 5, 16-17. Hurd, P. D. Science, technology, and society: New goals for interdisciplinary science teaching. The Science Teacher, February, 1975, 42: 2, 27-30. Kieffer, G. H. Future planning: Biology, society and ethical education. The Science Teacher, October, 1975, 42: 8, 10-12. Kranzburg, M. Energy, technology and the store of man. In R. Wolke (ed.), Impact: Science on Society. Philadlphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975. Kuhn, D. J. Teaching and the energy lesson. The Science Teacher, September, 1978, 45: 6, 32-33. Lenda, M. P. and Learn, Jr., G. D. Determining the "Half-life" of nuclear education. The Science Teacher, November, 1980, 47: 8, 27-29. Man, science, society: An alliance for hope. The 1975 NSTA Convention, The Science Teacher, May, 1975, 42_: 5, 20-23. McCormack, M. Science, facts, energy. The Science Teacher, May, 1982, 49: 5, 9. Nalence, E. E. Science—society minicourses hit home! The Science Teacher, September, 1980, 47: 6, 26-28. Pauling L. Scientists' obligation to improve human welfare. (Address given at the 1975 NSTA Convention in Los Angeles.) The Science Teacher, May, 1975, 42: 5, 22. Phillips, A. C. In the forward of Environmental education: strategies for wise use of energy. Division of Science Education, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Raleigh, N. C • 5 1974. Riban, D. M. Extended field studies in secondary education. The Science Teacher, March, 1977, 44: 3, 23-25. 82 Rice, D. R. and Dunlap, W. P. Introducing the ways and means of scientific inquiry. The Science Teacher, March, 1982, 49: 3, 56-57. Rowe, M. B. Who chooses sciences: a profile. The Science Teacher, April, 1978, _45: 4, 25-28. Rutherford, F. J. Convention '78 revisited. (Address given at NSTA's 26th Annual National Convention in Washington, D. C.). The Science Teacher, May, 1978, 45: 5, 27-34. Sagan, C. Convention '78 revisited. (Address given at NSTA's 26th Annual National Convention in Washington, D. C.). The Science Teacher, May, 1978, 45: 5, 27-34. Schroeer, D. Physics and its fifth dimension: society. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison, Wesley Publishing Company, 1972. Science and engineering education for the 1980's and beyond. Prepared by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Education, October, 1980. Science-technology-society: An NSTA position statement. BIE Report, May, 1982, 1: 1, 8. Science-technology-society: science education for the 1980s. An NSTA position statement, 1982, 1-6. Shrigley, R. L. The attitude concept and science teaching. Science Education, July, 1983, 67; 4, 425-442. Strong, L. E. Science, government, and society. In R. Wolke (Ed.), Impact: science on society. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975. Toffler, A. Future shock. New York: Random House, 1970. Water pollution pre-post test Project Concern A Title IV State Validated Project Developed at LaSalle, Illinois, 1977. Willett, R. E. and Roy, P. A. Crossing the cultural divide. The Science Teacher, May, 1982, 49: 5, 32-36. Wolke, R. L. Preface in Impact: Science on Society. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975. Ziman, J. The impact of social responsibility on science. In R. Wolke (Ed.), Impact: science on society. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975. APPENDIX A TABLES AND TESTING INSTRUMENTS 84 Table 5 Energy Attitude Instrument Pre-Test Responses Item Relative Frequency % a b c d e 1 40.00 44.00 10.00 6.00 .00 2 20.00 42.00 20.00 16.00 2.00 3 10.00 38.00 42.00 10.00 .00 4 .00 18.00 40.00 34.00 8.00 5 10.00 16.00 8.00 42.00 24.00 6 24.00 36.00 22.00 18.00 .00 7 10.00 26.00 42.00 10.00 12.00 8 30.00 26.00 28.00 14.00 2.00 9 22.00 52.00 8.00 12.00 6.00 10 16.00 40.00 12.00 20.00 12.00 11 4.00 2.00 14.00 24.00 56.00 12 .00 22.00 16.00 30.00 32.00 13 8.00 26.00 24.00 16.00 26.00 14 8.00 46.00 34.00 6.00 6.00 15 16.00 40.00 34.00 10.00 .00 16 10.00 26.00 24.00 28.00 12.00 17 10.00 28.00 32.00 22.00 8.00 18 4.00 8.00 28.00 42.00 18.00 19 10.00 62.00 20.00 6.00 2.00 20 6.00 16.00 10.00 22.00 46.00 21 4.00 44.00 30.00 12.00 10.00 22 16.00 38.00 26.00 14.00 6.00 23 16.00 36.00 28.00 16.00 4.00 24 14.00 18.00 16.00 38.00 14.00 25 32.00 36.00 18.00 6.00 6.00 85 Table 6 Energy Attitude Instrument Post-Test Responses Item Relative Frequency % a b c d e 1 50.00 44.00 .00 4.00 2.00 2 24.00 40.00 24.00 10.00 2.00 3 8.00 40.00 42.00 6.00 2.00 4 2.00 16.00 46.00 30.00 6.00 5 10.00 24.00 20.00 28.00 16.00 6 4.00 56.00 18.00 16.00 4.00 7 16.00 34.00 20.00 18.00 8.00 8 26.00 52.00 12.00 8.00 2.00 9 36.00 42.00 14.00 4.00 4.00 10 32.00 38.00 14.00 12.00 4.00 11 2.00 10.00 10.00 24.00 54.00 12 4.00 8.00 22.00 36.00 30.00 13 8.00 32.00 30.00 14.00 16.00 14 6.00 58.00 22.00 14.00 .00 15 18.00 34.00 18.00 24.00 6.00 16 6.00 16.00 14.00 28.00 36.00 17 4.00 22.00 32.00 28.00 14.00 18 .00 28.00 10.00 42.00 18.00 19 14.00 54.00 22.00 8.00 2.00 20 .00 12.00 16.00 40.00 30.00 21 8.00 38.00 20.00 20.00 14.00 22 8.00 58.00 22.00 10.00 2.00 23 26.00 42.00 20.00 6.00 6.00 24 14.00 36.00 14.00 22.00 14.00 25 36.00 38.00 10.00 8.00 2.00 86 Table 7 Energy Knowledge Instrument Module I Summary of Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores Student Pre Post Change Student Pre Post Change 1 12 18 +6 26 10 14 +4 2 18 20 +2 27 9 9 0 3 8 17 +9 28 11 14 +3 4 12 8 -4 29 8 13 +5 5 10 12 +2 30 11 19 +8 6 4 18 + 14 31 7 11 +4 7 17 19 +2 32 13 12 -1 8 6 11 +5 33 8 11 +3 9 9 14 +5 34 6 8 +2 10 7 15 +8 35 8 12 +4 11 7 14 +7 36 12 10 -2 12 13 18 +5 37 9 11 +2 13 10 15 +4 38 10 19 +9 14 8 17 +9 39 12 17 + 5 15 11 15 +4 40 12 15 +3 16 14 17 +3 41 11 12 + 1 17 7 9 +2 42 11 20 +9 18 10 16 +6 43 9 9 0 19 8 9 + 1 44 3 13 + 10 20 10 15 + 5 45 9 14 + 5 21 4 15 +11 46 6 16 + 10 22 15 17 +2 47 10 18 +8 23 4 12 +8 48 14 16 +2 24 8 8 0 49 8 13 + 5 25 4 13 +9 50 10 14 +4 Mean Scores Pre 9.46 Post 14.04 87 Table 8 Energy Knowledge Instrument Module II Summary of Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores Student Pre Post Change Student Pre Post Change 1 17 18 +1 26 13 17 +4 2 13 17 +4 27 11 12 +1 3 13 16 +3 28 6 14 +8 4 15 14 -1 29 5 15 + 10 5 9 11 +2 30 15 17 +2 6 14 18 +4 31 10 14 +4 7 17 20 +3 32 15 15 0 8 11 11 0 33 8 6 -2 9 14 18 +4 34 9 8 -1 10 11 14 +3 35 12 10 -2 11 13 15 +2 36 18 13 -5 12 12 17 +5 37 12 8 -4 13 13 19 +6 38 16 15 -1 14 12 17 +5 39 15 18 +3 15 15 15 0 40 18 20 +2 16 15 16 + 1 41 12 10 -2 17 11 7 -4 42 16 15 -1 18 10 11 + 1 43 7 12 +5 19 10 8 -2 44 10 14 +4 20 17 16 -1 45 15 14 -1 21 19 14 -5 46 14 17 +3 22 16 18 +2 47 13 15 +2 23 8 12 +2 48 17 18 + 1 24 13 12 -1 49 10 14 +4 25 12 17 + 5 50 16 14 -2 Mean Scores Pre 12.84 Post 14.34 88 Table 9 Energy Knowledge Instrument Module III Summary of Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores Student Pre Post Change Student Pre Post Change 1 18 20 +2 26 15 14 -1 2 15 21 +6 27 13 15 +2 3 15 18 +3 28 9 18 +9 4 16 15 -1 29 14 8 -6 5 10 14 +4 30 16 20 +4 6 16 13 -3 31 9 15 +6 7 14 18 +4 32 14 14 0 8 9 15 +6 33 10 10 0 9 12 14 +2 34 16 13 -3 10 12 13 +1 35 3 15 + 12 11 15 17 +2 36 13 10 -3 12 13 16 +3 37 13 13 0 13 13 16 +3 38 10 18 +8 14 16 18 +2 39 19 17 -2 15 15 20 +5 40 16 22 +6 16 9 12 +3 41 12 14 +2 17 10 16 +6 42 10 19 +9 18 16 16 0 43 9 15 +6 19 15 9 -6 44 13 16 +3 20 12 18 +6 45 17 18 + 1 21 15 17 +2 46 12 16 +4 22 19 22 +3 47 14 15 +1 23 11 17 +6 48 14 19 +5 24 8 12 +4 49 11 17 +6 25 13 16 +3 50 15 15 0 Mean Scores Pre 13.10 Post 15.78 89 Table 10 Energy Knowledge Instruments A t-Test Analysis Based on Pre-Test and Post-Test Data Module TT 2xi X2 EX 2 EX N df1 2 1 N2 t I 9.46 14.04 523 612 26 24 3.33 48 II 12.86 14.34 551 509 26 24 2.11 48 III 13.10 15.78 551 505 26 24 3.06 48 90 ENERGY AND SOCIETY Energy Attitude Instrument Ninth Level Instructions: You will be working with statements about Energy Attitudes on this test. You will not be graded on this test. Read each statement carefully. These five responses will be used for each statement: (a) strongly agree (b) agree (c) uncertain (d) disagree (e) strongly disagree. After you select a response, write the letter on your answer sheet. Try to answer all of the items. 1. The use and development of energy is one of today's most crucial issues. 2. Present energy problems could lead to a decrease in the standard of living in the United States. 3. Most other major countries of the world have serious energy problems at the present time. 4. Scientists and engineers will probably solve most of the energy problems of the United States in the next 10-15 years. 5. The United States should do everything possible to become independent of foreign supplies of oil even if this means heating oil and gasoline will cost significantly more. 6. Citizens can influence the Federal government in energy issues. 7. If we would better conserve our fossil fuel resources there would be enough energy to last indefinitely. 8. The production and use of energy in the United States is a threat to the quality of our air and water. 9-13. It would not bother me if one of the following kinds of large scale power plants (to generate electricity) were proposed to be built within 25 miles of my home. 9. Windmi11 power plant 10. Solar power plant 11. Nuclear power plant 12. Coal power plant 13. Hydroelectric dam 91 14. The total energy production around the world will have to increase greatly in order for other countries to significantly increase their standard of living. 15. There are enough fossil fuels for all countries of the world if we would better manage our energy resources. 16. There are only a few ways left by which energy can be significantly conserved in the United States; we are doing all we can. 17. The idea that an energy crisis existed was created by the government and oil companies in order for the oil companies to raise the prices of oil. 18. There is no real problem in importing most of our oil. 19. In a sense, conservation is an energy source. 20. Producing enough energy to meet our needs is far more important than protecting the environment. 21. Increasing nuclear power is a good way to meet future energy needs. 22. Spending tax dollars to develop ways to use wind energy to produce electricity is a wise investment. 23. More tax dollars should be spent to develop ways to convert solar energy into heat and electricity. 24. Production of large cars should be banned in the United States to help conserve fuel. 25. I want to learn more about energy problems and energy conservation. Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 25 were used by permission from Dr. Robert L. Dough's Energy and Society: Evaluation of Attitudes. 92 ENERGY AND SOCIETY 2Energy Knowledge Instrument Module INinth LevelIn.sTthruections: You will be working with questions about Energy on thistest. You will not be graded on this test. Read each5.An question carefully. Each question has a choice of fouranswers. After you select an answer, write the letteron your answer sheet. Try to answer all the items. Youwill need these formulas on the test:W = Fs; PE = Wh; KE = l/2mv2; P = w/t1. The statement which best describes energy is(a) Energy is always at rest.(b) Energy can exist in many forms.(c) Energy is not involved in doing work.(d) Energy is always in motion.foot-pound is an English system unit of(a) Weight(b) Force(c) Gravity(d) Work3. A metric unit of work and thus energy is(a) Joule(b) Foot-pound(c) Watt(d) Kilogram4. If John works faster than Fred during the same period of time, John(a) Does more work(b) Is more efficient(c) Uses more power(d) Gets tired fasterEnglish system unit of power is (a) Newton-meter (b) Joule (c) Dyne-centimeter/sec (d) Foot-pound/sec 67.. 93 WAhigcrheat deal of energy is available to the planet earth. The mostabundant source is(a) Geothermal energy(b) Solar radiation(c) Radioactivity(d) Wind poweruse of solar energy by organisms is most important to all life on earth? (a) The conversion of solar to chemical energy by green plants (b) The elevation of skin temperature in cold-blooded animals (c) The changing of sunlight to electricity by humans (d) The warming of eggs of reptiles by the sun 8. Which of the following results from solar radiation? (a) Earthquakes (b) Winds (c) Tides (d) Volcanoes 9. Men have learned to use the energy of the wind to (a) Produce electricity (b) Grind grain (c) Pump water (d) All of the above 10. A wind generator produces electricity by (a) Changing kinetic energy to electrical energy (b) Changing stored energy into kinetic energy (c) Changing electrical energy into heat energy (d) Changing kinetic energy to stored energy 11. Energy stored in a battery is (a) Kinetic energy (b) Mechanical energy (c) Chemical energy (d) Radiant energy 12. The energy released by a change in the center of the atom is (a) Chemical energy (b) Nuclear energy (c) Mechanical energy (d) Electrical energy 94 13. The type of energy conversion that occurs in an electric generator is (a) Electrical to mechanical (b) Chemical to mechanical (c) Mechanical to electrical (d) Electrical to gravitational 14. The type of energy conversion that occurs when a gasoline engine is operating is (a) Chemical to mechanical (b) Mechanical to chemical (c) Electrical to mechanical (d) Gravitational to electrical 15. The type of energy represented by water in a high storage tank is (a) Mechanical (b) Electrical potential (c) Radiant kinetic (d) Gravitational potential 16. When water from a high storage tank turns a turbine the type of energy conversion that takes place is (a) Chemical potential to radiant potential (b) Mechanical kinetic to chemical kinetic (c) Gravitational potential to mechanical kinetic (d) Electrical kinetic to mechanical kinetic 17. The action of a pump lifting water 50 feet into a storage tank is a good example of the definition of (a) Entropy (b) Work (c) Potential (d) Radiation 18. The best term to describe energy at rest is (a) Heat (b) Mechanical (c) Potential (d) Kinetic 19. The best term to describe energy in motion is (a) Kinetic (b) Gravitational (c) Potential (d) Mechanical 95 20. When you are standing on the edge of a cliff, you have potential energy but not kinetic energy. You slip over the edge of the cliff and when you hit the ground, your kinetic energy will change into heat and other forms of energy. This illustrates the Law of (a) Consumption of Energy (b) Distribution of Energy (c) Construction of Energy (d) Conservation of Energy 21. The energy given to a book which is lifted from the floor and placed on the table is changed into (a) Force (b) Power (c) Potential energy (d) Chemical energy 22. Two newtons of force applied through a distance of 10 meters does how many joules of work? (a) 5 joules (b) 20 joules (c) 8 joules (d) 12 joules 23. A 20 pound stone is carried to the top of a building 100 feet high. The potential energy of the stone is (a) 5 ft lbs (b) 20 ft lbs (c) 200 ft lbs (d) 2000 ft lbs 24. A mass of 10 kilograms has a velocity of 9.9 m/sec just as it strikes the ground. Its kinetic energy at that moment is (a) 49.5 joules (b) 99 joules (c) 490 joules (d) 495 joules 25. A man who weighs 200 pounds may be able to run up a 10 foot flight of stairs in 4 seconds. If so, his power is (a) 550 ft Ibs/sec (b) 55 ft Ibs/sec (c) 220 ft lbs/sec (d) 2200 ft Ibs/sec 96 ANSWER KEY FOR MODULE I 1.b 2.d 3.a 4.c .5d .6b a7. 8.b 9.d 10a. 1c1. 1.2b .13a 14.b 51.d 16.c 17b. 1c8. 1.9a .20d 21.c 22.b 23.d 24c. 2a5. 97 ENERGY AND SOCIETY Energy Knowledge Instrument Module II Ninth Level Instructions: You will be working with questions about Energy Sources on this test. You will not be graded on this test. Read each question carefully. Each question has a choice of four answers. After you select an answer, write the letter on your answer sheet. Try to answer all of the items. 1. The U. S. consumes about one-third of the world's energy, What primary source of energy does it rely on most? (a) Natural gas (b) Oil (c) Coal (d) Wood 2. Which of the following represents the largest source of energy reserves in the United States? (a) Coal (b) Oil (c) Natural gas (d) Nuclear 3. The three main fossil fuels used by man are (a) Coal, sunlight, uranium (b) Oil, plutonium, wave action (c) Plutonium, propane, hot springs (d) Coal, oil, natural gas 4. The source of energy used to produce the largest portion of electricity in the United States is (a) Oil (b) Natural gas (c) Coal (d) Falling water 5. Which environmental problem is not associated with the combustion of coal? (a) Strip mi ning (b) Radiation leaks (c) Acid streams (d) Sulfur dioxide 98 6. Which environmental problem is not associated with oil? (a) Spoiled beaches (b) Dead sea birds (c) Acid streams (d) Dead marine life 7. The largest portion of energy in the United States is consumed by which of the following economic sectors? (a) Transportation (b) Industrial (c) Commercial (d) Residential 8. The largest portion of oil in the United States is consumed by which of the following economic sectors? (a) Transportation (b) Industrial (c) Commercial (d) Residential 9. The biggest problem facing the petrochemical industry today is (a) People don't really understand the word petrochemical. (b) Oil and natural gas are becoming scarce. (c) The need for petrochemical products is declining. (d) The same products can be made from solar energy. 10. Of the following, which is presently the most limited fossil fuel resource, and thus, cannot be considered the answer to our long- term energy problem even though it is clean and environmentally safe? (a) Natural gas (b) Coal (c) Oil (d) Wood 11. A large scale energy source that is being used to supplement our limited oil and natural gas supplies is (a) Wood and other plants (b) Nuclear power (c) Solar energy (d) Wind power 99 12. An advantage of nuclear power plants over fossil fuel plants is (a) Nuclear power plants emit very small amounts of radioactive materials . (b) Nuclear power plants emit none of the products of combustion. (c) Nuclear power plants are designed specifically to withstand an earthquake. (d) Both a and b 13. An advantage of nuclear power plants is considered to be (a) Less need for mining and transport of fuel (b) Less reliance on imported oil (c) Reactors produce less waste than fossil fuel plants do (d) All of the above 14. A disadvantage of nuclear power plants is considered to be (a) Could be targets for terrorists (b) Higher cost to build (c) Radioactive waste must be handled and disposed of safely. (d) All of the above 15. In modern society the largest exposure to harmful radiation comes from (a) Medical use of X-rays (b) Natural or background radiation (c) Nuclear power plants (d) Radioisotopes 16. Which of the following are considered positive social effects of nuclear power? (a) Replacement or supplementation of depleted fossil fuel reserves (b) Cessation of air and water pollution caused in the fossil-fuel cycle of electricity generating plants (c) Provision of electricity for nations and regions that have little or not access to cheap fossil fuels (d) All of the above 17. Which of the following, on the average, contributes the least number of deaths in one year in the United States? (a) Traffic accidents (b) Drowning (c) Commerical nuclear power (d) Aircraft crashes 18. Of the following, which are social costs of nuclear power? (a) Hazard of nuclear reactor accident (b) Thermal pollution from power plants (c) Hazards to human health (d) All of the above TOO 19. The alternate energy source that is probably the safest, most abundant, and cheapest energy source is (a) Geothermal (b) Oil shale (c) Solar (d) Waste reclamation 20. Of the following, the best reason to use solar energy is (a) It does not reduce the quality of the environment. (b) It currently costs less than the use of fossil fuels. (c) It requires no expensive equipment. (d) It requires massive power plants. 21. The most positive socioeconomic reason to justify further research on wind power is (a) The "Fuel" for wind power plants is free. (b) Economically poor parts of the world would benefit more from wind power than from human and animal power. (c) The fuel for a wind power plant is available in a vast range of geographic locations. (d) The fuel for a wind power plant is not of uniform quality. 22. The country or area which exports the most petroleum is (a) Middle East (b) United States (c) Europe (d) Russia 23. The United States is presently importing what percent of the oil that it uses each year? (a) 15% (b) 30% (c) 50% (d) 75% 24. Of the following, what is true about U. S. dependence on oil imports? (a) We are vulnerable to embargos and threats of supply restrictions. (b) Our attitude toward oil-producing countries may be affected by our need to maintain a steady supply of oil. (c) Military strength depends on fuels, lubricants, and other products made from petroleum. (d) All of the above 101 25. The best national energy policy for the U. S. is one that (a) Channels limited oil and natural gas supplies for generating electricity (b) Relies on foreign sources to improve our international trade (c) Recognizes that oil and natural gas are irreplacable feedstocks for petrochemical products (d) Fails to keep up with the new energy developments Items 2, 4, 7, 22, 23 were used by permission from Dr. Robert L. Dough's Energy and Society: Evaluation of Knowledge. 102 ANSWER KEY FOR MODULE II 1.b .2a 3.d 4.c 5.b 6.c .7b .8a b9. 1.0a .11b 12.d 13.d 14.d 51.a 16.d 17c. 1d8. 1.9c .20a 21.b 22.a 23.c 24d. 2c5. 103 ENERGY AND SOCIETY Energy Knowledge Instrument Module III 2N.inAth LevelInstprupcrotixoinms: You will be working with questions about EnergyConsumption and Conservation on this test. You wi11not be graded on this test. Read each question care-fully. Each question has a choice of four answers.After you select an answer, write the letter on youranswer sheet. Try to answer all of the tiems. Youwill need these formulas on the test:watts xkwh hours cost= cost =1000 kwh x kwh1. Approximately what percent of the world's population lives in theUnited Satates?(a) 5%(b) 10%(c) 30%(d) 50% tely what percent of the energy consumed in the world this past year was consumed in the United States? (a) 10% (b) 20% (c) 30% (d) 50% 3. Which of the following will save more energy in a home? (a) Weather stripping (b) Installing 6 inches of additional insulation in an insulated atti c (c) Caulking doors and windows (d) Closing fireplace dampers 4. Energy is wasted when (a) A home is insulated (b) The home thermostat is turned down (c) Lights are left burning unnecessarily (d) Carpools are formed 104 5. The economic sector which consumes the largest portion of the nation's total energy is (a) Commercial (b) Industrial (c) Residential (d) Transportation 160..WWhhicichh of the following steps could be taken to conservetransportation energy usage?(a) Greater use of mass transit vehicles(b) Car pooling(c) Use of trains instead of trucks to transport freight(d) All of the above7. Which of the following appliances consumes the most energy in 15minutes of steady operation?(a) Electric clothes dryer(b) Washing machine(c) Color television(d) Vacuum cleaner8. Which of the following consumes the most energy in the averagehome in the United States in one year?(a) A refrigerator(b) Lighting the home(c) Heating water(d) Cooking food9. Which of the following is a good conservation practice?(a) Never use mass transit or car pooling(b) Buying appliances regardless of their energy efficiency(c) Heating and cooling rooms that aren't used(d) Installing storm windows and doorsof the following is a negative contribution of electricity to our society? (a) It creates jobs for people who extract and transport the fossil fuel for generating it. (b) It provides the power for most of our home appliances and for most of our forms of entertainment. (c) Its consumption leads to high utility bills. (d) It is largely responsible for the high standard of living and many of the luxuries we enjoy today. 105 11. How many kilowatt-hours of electrical energy did a family consume in a week if the meter reading on Monday was 35645 and on Friday it was 35770? (a) 12.5 (b) 125 (c) 250 (d) 1250 12. The cost of operating a 50 watt bulb for 20 hours at a rate of 6.5