Ketterman, ElizabethBesaw, Megan E.2011-06-212011-06-212010http://hdl.handle.net/10342/3504This study examines two point-of-care products: DynaMed® and UpToDate®. These resources were evaluated based on four criteria: search result counts, search result answers, reference counts, and currency of updates. The results of the study suggest that of the four areas evaluated, two indicate a statistical advantage of one database over the other. DynaMed contained updates that were more current, and UpToDate had a more significant total number of references used in a topic. The other two criteria, of initial search result counts and if there was an exact answer to the clinical question, did not produce a statistically significant difference.en-USDynaMedEvidence-based medicine toolsPoint-of-care resourcesProduct comparisonUpToDateArticle10.1080/15424065.2010.527238