The Objectivity of Accountants' Judgments: A Replication and Extension
Author
Dawson, Samantha L.
Abstract
This study examines accountants’ objectivity in estimating the value of an account. Its purpose is to determine whether professional objectivity, in generating a fair and unbiased accounting estimate, will be influenced by a possible conflict of interest. Students, proxying as accountants, completed an experiment to test the impact of two factors that could create a conflict of interest: a client’s legal position and fee structure of the engagement. We hypothesize that accountants will be influenced by their client’s legal position when providing estimates, and will be even more influenced when there is the possibility of being paid a fee contingent on the estimate.
Subject
Date
2016-05-02
Citation:
APA:
Dawson, Samantha L..
(May 2016).
The Objectivity of Accountants' Judgments: A Replication and Extension
(Honors Thesis, East Carolina University). Retrieved from the Scholarship.
(http://hdl.handle.net/10342/5578.)
MLA:
Dawson, Samantha L..
The Objectivity of Accountants' Judgments: A Replication and Extension.
Honors Thesis. East Carolina University,
May 2016. The Scholarship.
http://hdl.handle.net/10342/5578.
December 06, 2023.
Chicago:
Dawson, Samantha L.,
“The Objectivity of Accountants' Judgments: A Replication and Extension”
(Honors Thesis., East Carolina University,
May 2016).
AMA:
Dawson, Samantha L..
The Objectivity of Accountants' Judgments: A Replication and Extension
[Honors Thesis]. Greenville, NC: East Carolina University;
May 2016.
Collections
Publisher
East Carolina University