Antivenom Treatment Is Associated with Fewer Patients using Opioids after Copperhead Envenomation
Freiermuth, Caroline E.; Lavonas, Eric J.; Anderson, Victoria E; Kleinschmidt, Kurt C.; Sharma, Kapil; Rapp-Olsson, Malin; Gerardo, Charles
Introduction Copperhead envenomation causes local tissue destruction, leading people to seek treatment for the pain and swelling. First-line treatment for the pain is opioid medications. There is rising concern that an initial opioid prescription from the emergency department (ED) can lead to long-term addiction. This analysis sought to determine whether use of Fab antivenom (FabAV) for copperhead envenomation affected opioid use. Methods We performed a secondary analysis using data from a randomized clinical trial designed to determine the effect of FabAV on limb injury recovery following mild to moderate copperhead envenomation. Opioid use was a defined secondary outcome in the parent trial. Patients were contacted after discharge, and data were obtained regarding medications used for pain and the patients’ functional status. This analysis describes the proportion of patients in each treatment group reporting opioid use at each time point. It also assesses the interaction between functional status and use of opioids. Results We enrolled 74 patients in the parent trial (45 received FabAV, 29 placebo), of whom 72 were included in this secondary analysis. Thirty-five reported use of any opioids after hospital discharge. A smaller proportion of patients treated with FabAV reported opioid use: 40.9% vs 60.7% of those in the placebo group. The proportion of patients using opioids remained smaller in the FabAV group at each follow-up time point. Controlling for confounders and interactions between variables, the model estimated that the odds ratio of using opioids after hospital discharge among those who received placebo was 5.67 times that of those who received FabAV. Patients who reported higher baseline pain, those with moderate as opposed to mild envenomation, and females were more likely to report opioid use at follow-up. Patients with ongoing limitations to functional status had an increased probability of opioid use, with a stronger association over time. Opioid use corresponded with the trial’s predefined criteria for full recovery, with only two patients reporting opioid use in the 24 hours prior to achieving full limb recovery and no patients in either group reporting opioid use after full limb recovery. Conclusion In this study population, the proportion of patients using opioids for pain related to envenomation was smaller in the FabAV treatment group at all follow-up time points.
Freiermuth, Caroline E., & Lavonas, Eric J., & Anderson, Victoria E, & Kleinschmidt, Kurt C., & Sharma, Kapil, & Rapp-Olsson, Malin, & Gerardo, Charles. (March 2019). Antivenom Treatment Is Associated with Fewer Patients using Opioids after Copperhead Envenomation. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, (20:3), p.497-505. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7850
Freiermuth, Caroline E., and Lavonas, Eric J., and Anderson, Victoria E, and Kleinschmidt, Kurt C., and Sharma, Kapil, and Rapp-Olsson, Malin, and Gerardo, Charles. "Antivenom Treatment Is Associated with Fewer Patients using Opioids after Copperhead Envenomation". Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 20:3. (497-505.), March 2019. September 21, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7850.
Freiermuth, Caroline E. and Lavonas, Eric J. and Anderson, Victoria E and Kleinschmidt, Kurt C. and Sharma, Kapil and Rapp-Olsson, Malin and Gerardo, Charles, "Antivenom Treatment Is Associated with Fewer Patients using Opioids after Copperhead Envenomation," Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 20, no. 3 (March 2019), http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7850 (accessed September 21, 2020).
Freiermuth, Caroline E., Lavonas, Eric J., Anderson, Victoria E, Kleinschmidt, Kurt C., Sharma, Kapil, Rapp-Olsson, Malin, Gerardo, Charles. Antivenom Treatment Is Associated with Fewer Patients using Opioids after Copperhead Envenomation. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. March 2019; 20(3) 497-505. http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7850. Accessed September 21, 2020.