Repository logo
 

Robotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institution

dc.contributor.authorChitwood, W. Randolphen_US
dc.contributor.authorNifong, L. Wileyen_US
dc.contributor.authorChapman, William H. H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFelger, Jason E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBailey, B. Marcusen_US
dc.contributor.authorBallint, Taraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMendleson, Kim G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Victor B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYoung, James A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Robert A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-17T15:42:16Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-17T01:16:49Z
dc.date.available2011-02-17T15:42:16Zen_US
dc.date.available2011-05-17T01:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2001-10en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective To detail robotic procedure development and clinical applications for mitral valve, biliary, and gastric reflux operations, and to implement a multispecialty robotic surgery training curriculum for both surgeons and surgical teams. Summary Background Data Remote, accurate telemanipulation of intracavitary instruments by general and cardiac surgeons is now possible. Complex technologic advancements in surgical robotics require well-designed training programs. Moreover, efficient robotic surgical procedures must be developed methodically and safely implemented clinically. Methods Advanced training on robotic systems provides surgeon confidence when operating in tiny intracavitary spaces. Three-dimensional vision and articulated instrument control are essential. The authors’ two da Vinci robotic systems have been dedicated to procedure development, clinical surgery, and training of surgical specialists. Their center has been the first United States site to train surgeons formally in clinical robotics. Results Established surgeons and residents have been trained using a defined robotic surgical educational curriculum. Also, 30 multispecialty teams have been trained in robotic mechanics and electronics. Initially, robotic procedures were developed experimentally and are described. In the past year the authors have performed 52 robotic-assisted clinical operations: 18 mitral valve repairs, 20 cholecystectomies, and 14 Nissen fundoplications. These respective operations required 108, 28, and 73 minutes of robotic telemanipulation to complete. Procedure times for the last half of the abdominal operations decreased significantly, as did the knot-tying time in mitral operations. There have been no deaths and few complications. One mitral patient had postoperative bleeding. Conclusion Robotic surgery can be performed safely with excellent results. The authors have developed an effective curriculum for training teams in robotic surgery. After training, surgeons have applied these methods effectively and safely. Originally published Annals of Surgery, Vol. 234, No. 4, Oct 2001en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgery; 234:4 p. 475-486en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMC1422071en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/3235en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEast Carolina Universityen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/pages/issuelist.aspxen_US
dc.rightsAuthor notified of opt-out rights by Cammie Jennings prior to upload of this article.en_US
dc.subjectRobotic proceduresen_US
dc.subjectTraining curriculumen_US
dc.subjectCardiac surgeryen_US
dc.titleRobotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institutionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Robotic surgical training academic institution.pdf
Size:
2.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections