Repository logo
 

EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT PERFORMANCE

dc.contributor.advisorBradshaw, Lynn Kilpatricken_US
dc.contributor.authorSavage, Marken_US
dc.contributor.departmentEducational Leadershipen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-18T20:16:13Z
dc.date.available2012-07-31T13:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.description.abstractDifferentiated instruction (DI) is a collection of strategies utilized to increase student achievement and engagement. School districts are using the strategies of differentiated instruction to increase student academic achievement based on No Child Left Behind mandates. The purpose of this quantitative study, which utilizes two pre-existing data sources, was to determine if there was a difference between student standardized test scores as measured by the North Carolina End-of-Course (NC EOC) tests based on the level of their teachers' use of differentiated instructional strategies.  Few studies have examined the results of students' academic achievement of teachers who utilize DI strategies compared to those teachers who do not utilize DI strategies as regularly. This study sought to determine if End-of-Course effectiveness residuals for teachers at a single high school were significantly higher for those teachers who practiced differentiated strategies more frequently than teachers who did not practice DI strategies as regularly. The study utilized a survey created at Margate High School (a pseudonym) and teacher residual data prepared by the district's Evaluation and Research department.   T-tests were used to determine if there was a significant difference in average residual scores between teachers who frequently practiced differentiated strategies than their peers who did not employ the strategies as regularly. Additional t-tests determined if there were differences in the average residual scores of those who more frequently differentiated content, process and product than their peers.  School leaders must consistently evaluate instructional programs to determine their effectiveness on student academic achievement. While differentiated instruction has a strong foundation in both educational theory and brain research, the literature is mixed as to its efficacy; therefore, additional research needs to be conducted to determine the impact of differentiated instruction on student achievement.  en_US
dc.description.degreeEd.D.en_US
dc.format.extent197 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumdissertations, academicen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/3761
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEast Carolina Universityen_US
dc.subjectEducational leadershipen_US
dc.subjectNo Child Left Behind Act of 2001
dc.subject.lcshEducational evaluation--North Carolina
dc.subject.lcshEducational tests and measurements--North Carolina
dc.subject.lcshAchievement tests--North Carolina
dc.subject.lcshAcademic achievement--North Carolina
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
dc.titleEXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT PERFORMANCEen_US
dc.typeDoctoral Dissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Savage_ecu_0600D_10521.pdf
Size:
831.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format