Development of a Meal Creation Tool to Assess Knowledge and Preference among Preschool Children

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Please login to access this content.

Primary LISSON-HONORSTHESIS-2016.pdf (506.78 KB)

Authors

Lisson, Sarah E.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

East Carolina University

Abstract

Knowledge and preference towards healthful foods can help researchers better understand developing health behaviors; however, few validated tools are available to evaluate these constructs among young children. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot-test a Pictorial Meal Creation Tool (PMCT) to assess preschool children’s knowledge of and preference towards healthy foods/beverages commonly served during snack and mealtime. Researchers developed and cognitively evaluated 32 high-quality photographs of foods/beverages. The final PMCT featured 20 photographs of foods presented to children in five groups (four photographs/group): snack, main entrée, fruit/vegetable side dish, dairy/grain side dish, and beverage. The PMCT was administered to 32 children in three early childcare centers on two separate sessions: (1) knowledge was assessed by asking children to select a “healthy” snack, meal (entrée, two side dishes), and beverage for a proxy teddy bear; (2) preference was assessed by asking children to select a “preferred” snack, meal, and beverage for themselves. Data were analyzed using Spearman’s Rho and Wilcoxin signed-rank tests. Foods were ranked from least healthy (1) to most healthy (4). No significant differences between the selected “healthy” and “preferred” snacks (H=2.50±1.38; P=2.00±1.08), meals (H=2.31±.65; P=2.14±.48), or beverages (H=2.20±1.19; P=1.87±.97) were observed; however, children’s “healthy” selections ranked higher on average. Photographs are a promising way to assess knowledge/preference among preschool children. The application of PMCT to assess children’s food preferences is promising; however, further research is needed to determine the efficacy of these methods to assess knowledge. Further validation research in a larger sample is warranted.

Description

Citation

item.page.doi

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By