Repository logo
 

Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance

dc.contributor.authorHazelton, Anthony Garrett
dc.contributor.authorAl-Khatib, Sana M.
dc.contributor.authorFonarow, Gregg C.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Kevin L.
dc.contributor.authorHayes, David
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Gillian D.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorYancy, Clyde
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Eric D.
dc.contributor.authorSears, Samuel F.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-28T14:18:23Z
dc.date.available2016-06-28T14:18:23Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractBackground Conveying contemporary treatment options for those at risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is challenging. The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the quality and usability of available patient educational tools relevant to SCA and its treatment options, such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We hypothesized that this review would identify gaps in areas of information for the enhancement of patient education and decision-making materials. Methods We used a formal instrument to assess specific domains of content, development, and effectiveness of 18 available SCA and ICD educational tools. The multidisciplinary review panel included two electrophysiologists, two general cardiologists, a cardiac psychologist, a health services researcher, and a patient advocate. Results Of the 18 education tools, four were rated as “good, may need revisions, but sufficient for use”, 12 were rated as “marginal, needs revision prior to use”, and two were rated as “poor, inadequate for use”. None of the tools were rated as being of “very good” or “excellent” quality. Conclusion There appear to be opportunities to improve the quality and completeness of existing educational tools for patients with SCA and ICD. While many tools have been developed, they fall below current standards for supporting informed medical decision-making.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPatient preference and adherence; 7: p. 361-368en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/PPA.S42637
dc.identifier.issn1177-889X
dc.identifier.pmidpmc3639714en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/5806
dc.relation.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639714/en_US
dc.subjectdecision-makingen_US
dc.subjectimplantable cardioverter defibrillatorsen_US
dc.subjectpatient-centered outcomes researchen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Allianceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ecu.journal.namePatient preference and adherenceen_US
ecu.journal.pages361-368en_US
ecu.journal.volume7en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ppa-7-361.PMC3639714.pdf
Size:
223.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format