Repository logo
 

Director Co-option and the Cash Conversion Cycl

dc.access.optionRestricted Campus Access Only
dc.contributor.advisorHampton, Jonathan
dc.contributor.advisorHarris, Oneil
dc.contributor.authorHampton, Jonathan Bradley
dc.contributor.committeeMemberHampton, Jonathan
dc.contributor.departmentFinance
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-19T17:41:24Z
dc.date.available2022-12-01T09:02:00Z
dc.date.created2021-12
dc.date.issued2022-05-06
dc.date.submittedDecember 2021
dc.date.updated2022-07-12T14:47:35Z
dc.degree.departmentFinance
dc.degree.disciplineFinance
dc.degree.grantorEast Carolina University
dc.degree.levelUndergraduate
dc.degree.nameBSBA
dc.description.abstractThis study examines whether co-opted directors degrade or improve working capital efficiency. We find strong evidence that firms with more co-opted boards exhibit lower cash conversion cycles and so are more efficient at managing working capital. After controlling for other factors, board co-option reduces the length of the cash conversion cycle by about -1.2%, whereas the co-option of independent directors reduces the cycle by nearly -2.0%. These results persist even after addressing endogeneity and are robust to alternate measures of the cash conversion cycle. In general, our study lends credence to the argument that co-option reduces managerial myopic behavior as it reduces the likelihood of dismissal and so motivates managers to make better investment decisions that may improve firm proficiency.
dc.embargo.lift2022-12-01
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/10851
dc.publisherEast Carolina University
dc.subjectBoard co-option
dc.subjectCash conversion cycle
dc.titleDirector Co-option and the Cash Conversion Cycl
dc.typeHonors Thesis
dc.type.materialtext

Files

Collections