Director Co-option and the Cash Conversion Cycl
dc.access.option | Restricted Campus Access Only | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hampton, Jonathan | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Harris, Oneil | |
dc.contributor.author | Hampton, Jonathan Bradley | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Hampton, Jonathan | |
dc.contributor.department | Finance | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-19T17:41:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-01T09:02:00Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-06 | |
dc.date.submitted | December 2021 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-07-12T14:47:35Z | |
dc.degree.department | Finance | |
dc.degree.discipline | Finance | |
dc.degree.grantor | East Carolina University | |
dc.degree.level | Undergraduate | |
dc.degree.name | BSBA | |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines whether co-opted directors degrade or improve working capital efficiency. We find strong evidence that firms with more co-opted boards exhibit lower cash conversion cycles and so are more efficient at managing working capital. After controlling for other factors, board co-option reduces the length of the cash conversion cycle by about -1.2%, whereas the co-option of independent directors reduces the cycle by nearly -2.0%. These results persist even after addressing endogeneity and are robust to alternate measures of the cash conversion cycle. In general, our study lends credence to the argument that co-option reduces managerial myopic behavior as it reduces the likelihood of dismissal and so motivates managers to make better investment decisions that may improve firm proficiency. | |
dc.embargo.lift | 2022-12-01 | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10342/10851 | |
dc.publisher | East Carolina University | |
dc.subject | Board co-option | |
dc.subject | Cash conversion cycle | |
dc.title | Director Co-option and the Cash Conversion Cycl | |
dc.type | Honors Thesis | |
dc.type.material | text |