• Find People
  • Campus Map
  • PiratePort
  • A-Z
    • About
    • Submit
    • Browse
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   ScholarShip Home
    • Academic Affairs
    • Honors College
    • View Item
    •   ScholarShip Home
    • Academic Affairs
    • Honors College
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of The ScholarShipCommunities & CollectionsDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDate SubmittedThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDate Submitted

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Google Analytics Statistics

    Assessing Morphological Variability in Silversides along the Mid-Atlantic Bight

    Thumbnail
    View/ Open
    Stephen Parker Senior Honors Project.doc (3.399Mb)

    Show full item record
    Author
    Parker, Stephen
    Abstract
    Inland silversides (Menidia beryllina) and Atlantic silversides (Menidia menidia) are ubiquitous fishes in the estuaries on the east coast of the United States. These species are very similar in appearance and may share many morphological traits. Many different biological processes have the potential to produce dissimilarities in shape between individuals or their characteristics and such shape distinctions can be indicative of varying selective pressures. Morphometrics, a branch of mathematical shape analysis, is a quantitative approach to understanding the diverse causes of variation and morphological transformation. In this study, I analyzed conspecific silverside populations to test for the presence of potential morphological variance within and between species through geometric analysis of landmark coordinates. Preserved specimens were pinned on dissection trays and photographed. These photographs were imported into tpsDIG2, a computer program for digitizing landmarks and outlines for geometric morphometric analyses. Eight landmarks were plotted on each fish and superimposed using the Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) method. Two covariance functions were employed in data analysis, Procrustes ANOVA/regression for shape data (procD.lm) and pairwise group comparisons (pairwiseD.test). Significant differences were observed between the Atlantic silversides from Maryland and all other species specific location groups. Maryland populations in reference to North Carolina populations exhibited the greatest morphological differences. Most variation was observed in the first and second dorsal fins, the pelvic fin, and the anal fin although it varied by location. The selective pressures and environmental conditions of these locations must be studied further to determine the primary driver(s) of this observed morphological variation.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10342/4777
    Subject
     Menidia; Geometric morphometrics; Generalized procrustes analysis; Inland silversides; Atlantic silversides 
    Date
    2015
    Citation:
    APA:
    Parker, Stephen. (January 2015). Assessing Morphological Variability in Silversides along the Mid-Atlantic Bight (Honors Thesis, East Carolina University). Retrieved from the Scholarship. (http://hdl.handle.net/10342/4777.)

    Display/Hide MLA, Chicago and APA citation formats.

    MLA:
    Parker, Stephen. Assessing Morphological Variability in Silversides along the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Honors Thesis. East Carolina University, January 2015. The Scholarship. http://hdl.handle.net/10342/4777. July 03, 2022.
    Chicago:
    Parker, Stephen, “Assessing Morphological Variability in Silversides along the Mid-Atlantic Bight” (Honors Thesis., East Carolina University, January 2015).
    AMA:
    Parker, Stephen. Assessing Morphological Variability in Silversides along the Mid-Atlantic Bight [Honors Thesis]. Greenville, NC: East Carolina University; January 2015.
    Collections
    • Biology
    • Honors College

    xmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.elsevier_entitlement

    East Carolina University has created ScholarShip, a digital archive for the scholarly output of the ECU community.

    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Send Feedback