• Find People
  • Campus Map
  • PiratePort
  • A-Z
    • About
    • Submit
    • Browse
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   ScholarShip Home
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Master's Theses
    • View Item
    •   ScholarShip Home
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Master's Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of The ScholarShipCommunities & CollectionsDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDate SubmittedThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDate Submitted

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Google Analytics Statistics

    Reading Through Madness: A Narrative Comparison of Plath and Hornbacher

    Thumbnail
    View/ Open
    KNOTT-MASTERSTHESIS-2017.pdf (312.2Kb)

    Show full item record
    Author
    Knott, Sophronia
    Abstract
    This thesis will compare the private journals of Sylvia Plath to the memoirs of Marya Hornbacher, tracing the similarities in rhetorical language between the two narratives. The similarities between the two authors show the presence of both mania and depression on a literary level. While the thesis is not arguing whether or not these experiences of mania and depression are medically or scientifically validated, it is arguing that there are numerous, traceable, and identifiable characteristics that span across madness narratives within the specific cultural framework of a woman's experience. A close analysis of the private journals of Plath shows a cognitive narration of the experience of having manic and depressive episodes. This thesis argues that both texts show discreet, linguistic indicators of depression and mania and that these experiences construct causality for both the author and the audience out of disorder and chaos, but doing so through a distinctly female point of view. By comparing similarities in metaphors, adverbial intensifiers, and second person narration, readers are able to get a sense of what it is like to experience life as a female with a mental illness. Therefore, these traceable, identifiable rhetorical and literary features of madness are essential to the validation of the self of both the author and the reader, making the study of madness narratives invaluable for understanding the female literary mind.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10342/6478
    Subject
     narratives; nonfiction 
    Date
    2017-12-06
    Citation:
    APA:
    Knott, Sophronia. (December 2017). Reading Through Madness: A Narrative Comparison of Plath and Hornbacher (Master's Thesis, East Carolina University). Retrieved from the Scholarship. (http://hdl.handle.net/10342/6478.)

    Display/Hide MLA, Chicago and APA citation formats.

    MLA:
    Knott, Sophronia. Reading Through Madness: A Narrative Comparison of Plath and Hornbacher. Master's Thesis. East Carolina University, December 2017. The Scholarship. http://hdl.handle.net/10342/6478. September 30, 2023.
    Chicago:
    Knott, Sophronia, “Reading Through Madness: A Narrative Comparison of Plath and Hornbacher” (Master's Thesis., East Carolina University, December 2017).
    AMA:
    Knott, Sophronia. Reading Through Madness: A Narrative Comparison of Plath and Hornbacher [Master's Thesis]. Greenville, NC: East Carolina University; December 2017.
    Collections
    • Master's Theses
    Publisher
    East Carolina University

    xmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.elsevier_entitlement

    East Carolina University has created ScholarShip, a digital archive for the scholarly output of the ECU community.

    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Send Feedback