Repository logo
 

Construct validity of a continuous metabolic syndrome score in children

dc.contributor.authorEisenmann, Joey C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLaurson, Kelly R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDuBose, Katrina D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Bryan K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Joseph E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-28T19:50:13Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-16T20:40:50Z
dc.date.available2011-02-28T19:50:13Zen_US
dc.date.available2011-05-16T20:40:50Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-28en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The primary purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of a continuous metabolic syndrome score (cMetS) in children. The secondary purpose was to identify a cutpoint value(s) for an adverse cMetS based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Methods: 378 children aged 7 to 9 years were assessed for the metabolic syndrome which was determined by age-modified cutpoints. High-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, the homeostasis assessment model of insulin resistance, mean arterial pressure, and waist circumference were used to create a cMetS for each subject. Results: About half of the subjects did not possess any risk factors while about 5% possessed the metabolic syndrome. There was a graded relationship between the cMetS and the number of adverse risk factors. The cMetS was lowest in the group with no adverse risk factors (-1.59 ± 1.76) and highest in those possessing the metabolic syndrome (≥3 risk factors) (7.05 ± 2.73). The cutoff level yielding the maximal sensitivity and specificity for predicting the presence of the metabolic syndrome was a cMetS of 3.72 (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 93.9%, and the area of the curve = 0.978 (0.957-0.990, 95% confidence intervals). Conclusion: The results demonstrate the construct validity for the cMetS in children. Since there are several drawbacks to identifying a single cut-point value for the cMetS based on this sample, we urge researchers to use the approach herein to validate and create a cMetS that is specific to their study population. Originally published Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome, Vol. 2, No. 8, Jan 2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome; 2:1 p. 8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1758-5996-2-8
dc.identifier.pmidPMC2830968en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/3256en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEast Carolina Universityen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.dmsjournal.com/content/2/1/8en_US
dc.rightsAuthor notified of opt-out rights by Cammie Jennings.en_US
dc.subjectMetabolic syndromeen_US
dc.subjectConstruct validityen_US
dc.subjectCutpoint valuesen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.titleConstruct validity of a continuous metabolic syndrome score in childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ecu.journal.issue1
ecu.journal.nameDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
ecu.journal.pages8
ecu.journal.volume2

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Construct validity of continuous metabolic syndrome.pdf
Size:
333.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections