Pregaming: A Field-Based Investigation of Alcohol Quantities Consumed Prior to Visiting a Bar and Restaurant District

dc.contributor.authorChaney, Beth H.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Ryan J.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Joseph G. L.
dc.contributor.authorCremeens-Matthews, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorStellefson, Michael L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-19T18:35:20Z
dc.date.available2022-05-19T18:35:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBackground: Investigations examining the association between pregaming, or the consumption of alcohol prior to attending a social gathering or drinking establishment, and blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) have primarily relied on estimations (i.e., Widmark equation), rather than objective biologic samples, such as breath alcohol concentration (BrAC). Objectives: The current study assessed: (1) pregaming, using quantity-based measures, among a sample of college and non-college affiliated bar patrons, (2) associations between pregaming intensity/status and participant intoxication (BrAC), and (3) whether participants who pregamed were more likely to identify as a hazardous drinker. Methods: 548 bar patrons provided data on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) and a single pregaming item assessing quantity of alcohol consumed prior to visiting a bar/restaurant district in 2015. BrAC samples were collected post interview. We used hierarchical linear regression models, respectively, to assess whether pregaming significantly impacted BrAC and whether presence of hazardous drinking predicted pregaming behavior. Results After controlling for sex, race/ethnicity, age, student status, and Greek affiliation, the linear regression model explained 32.3% (R2 =.323) of the variance of BrAC levels (F(12)= 21.162, p<0.001), with 4.30% of the variance explained solely by pregaming (β =0.014; p<0.001). The linear regression model to assess if harzardous drinking behavior (AUDIT-C) significantly predicted pregaming explained 31.2% (R2 =.312) of the variance of pregaming behavior (F(18)= 13.276, p<0.001), with 4.2% of the variance explained solely by AUDIT-C scores (β =0.280; p<0.001). Conclusion: Findings further highlight pregaming as a harmful risk behavior linked to elevated levels of hazardous drinking and intoxication.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10826084.2018.1558252
dc.identifier.pmid30614346en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10342/10608
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2018.1558252en_US
dc.subjectAUDIT-Cen_US
dc.subjectPregamingen_US
dc.subjectBreath Alcohol Concentration (BrAC)en_US
dc.subjectHazardous drinkingen_US
dc.subjectAlcohol field studyen_US
dc.titlePregaming: A Field-Based Investigation of Alcohol Quantities Consumed Prior to Visiting a Bar and Restaurant Districten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ecu.journal.issue6en_US
ecu.journal.nameSubstance Use and Misuseen_US
ecu.journal.pages1017-1023en_US
ecu.journal.volume54en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Chaney_Pregaming_Manuscript.docx
Size:
76.61 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Authors Manuscript