• Find People
  • Campus Map
  • PiratePort
  • A-Z
    • About
    • Submit
    • Browse
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   ScholarShip Home
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Master's Theses
    • View Item
    •   ScholarShip Home
    • Dissertations and Theses
    • Master's Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of The ScholarShipCommunities & CollectionsDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDate SubmittedThis CollectionDateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDate Submitted

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Google Analytics Statistics

    ALL IS NOT FAIR IN THE APPRAISALS OF PERFORMANCE: APPRAISALS, JUSTICE, AND WORK OUTCOMES

    Thumbnail
    View/ Open
    BOARD-MASTERSTHESIS-2018.pdf (807.3Kb)
    Board PA IRB.pdf (75.21Kb)
    Board PA IRB_1.pdf (75.21Kb)

    Show full item record
    Author
    Board, Toby E
    Abstract
    This study examined the moderating effect of core self-evaluation (CSE) on the relationship between perceptions of procedural performance appraisal justice (PAJ) and the components of engagement (vigor, dedication, and absorption) and burnout (emotional exhaustion, professional inefficacy, and cynicism). Both procedural PAJ and CSE significantly predicted all components of engagement and burnout. Specifically, higher levels of PAJ and CSE predicted higher engagement and lower burnout. Moreover, CSE significantly moderated the relationship between procedural PAJ and absorption such that high CSE individuals were less affected by procedural performance appraisal justice compared to that of low CSE individuals. Overall, the findings suggest two things: (1) having more procedurally just performance appraisal processes and high CSE employees should lead to more engaged and less burned out employees and (2) higher levels of core self-evaluation may play a critical mitigating role in the relationship between procedural PAJ perceptions and absorption.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7246
    Subject
     performance appraisals; engagement 
    Date
    2019-04-12
    Citation:
    APA:
    Board, Toby E. (April 2019). ALL IS NOT FAIR IN THE APPRAISALS OF PERFORMANCE: APPRAISALS, JUSTICE, AND WORK OUTCOMES (Master's Thesis, East Carolina University). Retrieved from the Scholarship. (http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7246.)

    Display/Hide MLA, Chicago and APA citation formats.

    MLA:
    Board, Toby E. ALL IS NOT FAIR IN THE APPRAISALS OF PERFORMANCE: APPRAISALS, JUSTICE, AND WORK OUTCOMES. Master's Thesis. East Carolina University, April 2019. The Scholarship. http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7246. September 30, 2023.
    Chicago:
    Board, Toby E, “ALL IS NOT FAIR IN THE APPRAISALS OF PERFORMANCE: APPRAISALS, JUSTICE, AND WORK OUTCOMES” (Master's Thesis., East Carolina University, April 2019).
    AMA:
    Board, Toby E. ALL IS NOT FAIR IN THE APPRAISALS OF PERFORMANCE: APPRAISALS, JUSTICE, AND WORK OUTCOMES [Master's Thesis]. Greenville, NC: East Carolina University; April 2019.
    Collections
    • Master's Theses
    Publisher
    East Carolina University

    xmlui.ArtifactBrowser.ItemViewer.elsevier_entitlement

    East Carolina University has created ScholarShip, a digital archive for the scholarly output of the ECU community.

    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Send Feedback